Template-Based Action Guides for Real-Time User Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies fail to adequately utilize data processing to evaluate user actions in real time, lacking effective methods to leverage reference data for informed decision-making.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that includes a processor and memory to receive user actions, rank them, obtain action template data, generate a template action expectation, determine feasibility, and provide an action guide based on this data, using machine learning models and algorithms to analyze user actions and template data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If data processing is used to evaluate user actions, then evaluation accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the evaluation process into distinct modules: user action reception module, template matching module, feasibility determination module, and guide generation module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the evaluation, making the complex system more manageable and maintainable while achieving accurate real-time evaluation through coordinated operation of these specialized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-storing action template data and evaluation criteria in the database before actual user actions occur. This allows the system to quickly match and evaluate user actions against pre-prepared templates, improving evaluation accuracy and speed without requiring complex real-time processing of all evaluation logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If reference data is leveraged for informed decision-making, then decision quality is improved, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision qualityVSAvoiddata processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selectively matching user actions against relevant action templates based on action type and context, rather than processing all possible templates. This approach ensures high decision quality through comprehensive evaluation of applicable templates while reducing data processing requirements by focusing only on relevant comparisons

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating simplified representations of user actions that match the structure of stored action templates. This allows efficient comparison and evaluation against reference data without processing the full complexity of original user actions, maintaining decision quality while reducing processing demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250218305A1Apparatus and method for determining action guides
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 THE STRATEGIC COACH
  • US20250218305A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218305A1 patent drawing
  • US20250218305A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and method for determining action guides is disclosed. The apparatus includes at least a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor, wherein the memory contains instructions configuring the at least a processor to receive a user action, wherein the user action includes a user usage, convert the user usage of the user action into a current usage, obtain action template data, wherein the action template data includes a template usage, generate a template action expectation as a function of the user action and the action template data, determine an action feasibility as a function of the current usage and the template action expectation and generate an action guide as a function of the action feasibility.