User Activity Analysis System for Multi-Location Digital Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multi-user, multi-location digital environments, less experienced users (novices) are at a disadvantage due to more experienced users (experts) exploiting their presence by reserving positions and becoming idle, leading to novices' decreased participation and overall population decline, which is difficult for administrators to monitor across numerous locations and servers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for analyzing user activity and preferences that identifies mixed-state users active at one location and inactive at another, with exceptions, and takes corrective action such as warnings or removal from inactive locations, utilizing global state managers and asynchronous processing to balance analysis across multiple servers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If experts reserve positions and become idle waiting for novices, then experts can exploit novices for gain, but system fairness and novice participation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpert strategy implementationVSAvoidsystem fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user states before matching users to locations. By analyzing whether users are mixed-state (active at one location, inactive at another) and checking for justifications or exceptions, the system prevents experts from reserving positions and becoming idle, thereby maintaining system fairness before exploitation can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors user states and provides feedback by identifying mixed-state users without valid justifications. This feedback mechanism allows the system to detect and address expert exploitation behavior in real-time, preventing unfair advantages while maintaining overall system fairness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If administrators actively monitor all digital locations, then user behavior can be detected, but system complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser behavior detectionVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring function is extracted from individual location administrators and centralized into a global analysis system. The system extracts user state information from multiple locations and performs centralized analysis to identify mixed-state users, reducing the complexity burden on individual monitoring points while maintaining comprehensive detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The analysis system serves multiple locations and users simultaneously through a universal monitoring approach. By creating a multi-functional system that can analyze user states across numerous locations and servers concurrently, the system achieves comprehensive monitoring without proportionally increasing complexity at each individual location

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If the system hosts hundreds or thousands of users at hundreds or thousands of locations, then user population and activity increase, but monitoring capability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser populationVSAvoiduser state analysis difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments user monitoring into discrete analyzable units by evaluating user states at each location independently. By breaking down the complex monitoring task into location-specific user state evaluations, the system can efficiently handle hundreds or thousands of users across multiple locations without overwhelming the analysis capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system focuses analysis on specific critical cases rather than attempting to monitor every user state uniformly. By identifying and analyzing mixed-state users (those active at one location and inactive at another) with exceptions, the system applies partial action to the most problematic cases, effectively managing large-scale user populations without requiring exhaustive monitoring of all user states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9643090B2System and method for user activity and preference analysis in a multi-user, multi-instance environment
Publication Date: 2017.05.09 PARTYGAMING IA LTD
  • US9643090B2 patent drawing
  • US9643090B2 patent drawing
  • US9643090B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for user activity and preference analysis in a multi-user, multi-location digital environment that analyzes each user's state at each location where the user is present. If the user is present at multiple locations, the system and method also identify users that have mixed states, i.e., active at one or more locations and inactive at one or more second locations. If a user does not have a system-acceptable exception for its inactive state, the system and method may take action with respect to the user, which action may include warning the user or removing the user from the location.