User Activity Recommendation System for Task Completion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in obtaining consistent technical support due to variability across computing devices, software developers, and user experience paradigms, leading to user frustration and decreased satisfaction.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates user activity recommendations by evaluating implicit and explicit user signals to identify a set of actions associated with a task, allowing for the recommendation of actions to facilitate task completion, thereby reducing user frustration and increasing productivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If users seek technical support from third parties, then they can obtain support for their issues, but the support is inconsistent and frustrating due to variability across devices and developers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of technical supportVSAvoiduser frustration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables users to provide technical support to themselves by automatically analyzing their own device state, application usage patterns, and error logs to generate personalized troubleshooting recommendations and solutions without requiring external support personnel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors user activity signals and device state, providing real-time feedback about system health and usage patterns to generate dynamic support recommendations that adapt to the user's specific situation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system analyzes user activity signals to generate recommendations, then technical support quality improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetechnical support qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal analysis framework that can process multiple types of user activity signals (explicit and implicit) through a single integrated architecture, allowing one system to handle diverse data sources from different devices and applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis layer that sits between the user's device and the support recommendation generation, abstracting the complexity of signal processing and data analysis while providing simplified, actionable recommendations to the user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the system provides comprehensive technical support, then user issues are resolved more effectively, but the time required for support increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissue resolution effectivenessVSAvoidsupport time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user activity signals and device state before the user reports an issue, pre-generating troubleshooting recommendations and identifying potential problems so that when support is needed, the system can provide immediate, targeted solutions rather than conducting comprehensive analysis during the support interaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system rapidly processes and analyzes user activity signals using efficient algorithms that quickly identify relevant patterns and generate recommendations without exhaustive analysis, skipping unnecessary processing steps while maintaining effective support quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS12301684B2User activity recommendation
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12301684B2 patent drawing
  • US12301684B2 patent drawing
  • US12301684B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In examples, a user activity recommendation is generated for troubleshooting and/or for improving user understanding of software and/or hardware functionality. In examples, implicit and/or explicit user signals are evaluated to identify a set of actions associated with a task being performed by the user, such that the set of actions are evaluated to determine whether one or more actions can be recommended to the user to facilitate completion of the user's task accordingly. For instance, a recommended action may resolve an issue encountered by the user and/or may enable the user to complete the task more quickly, among other examples. Thus, as a result of generating and providing a user activity recommendation, user frustration may be reduced, user productivity may be increased, technical support may be provided more quickly, and guidance may be provided even in instances where such guidance was not provided by a third-party software developer.