User Data Indexing via Segmented Evaluation Categories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems fail to effectively index and evaluate user data in distributed computing environments, particularly in financial applications, to assess user performance and provide iterative developmental resources for improvement.

Innovation Solution

The system dynamically generates user input objects associated with evaluation categories, determines evaluation attributes through comparisons with other users' data and machine learning models, and provides developmental resources to enhance user performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional systems are used for data indexing and evaluation, then system simplicity is maintained, but user performance evaluation effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser performance evaluation effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments user data into multiple evaluation categories (e.g., knowledge, skills, behaviors) and processes each category separately through dedicated input objects and evaluation rules. This segmentation enables precise measurement of specific performance dimensions while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components including evaluation models, input objects, and processing rules that mediate between raw user data and performance evaluations. These intermediaries transform complex evaluation tasks into structured, manageable processes that improve measurement precision without requiring direct complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If dynamic user data processing is implemented, then evaluation accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-defining evaluation categories, input objects, and processing rules before actual user data evaluation. This preparation work enables rapid processing of user data during evaluation execution, improving accuracy through structured processing while reducing actual processing time through avoided ad-hoc analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes processing parameters by adapting evaluation rules and input objects based on user characteristics and context. This dynamic parameter adjustment improves evaluation accuracy for different user types while maintaining efficient processing through parameter-based rather than structure-based adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If comprehensive user data collection is performed, then evaluation completeness is improved, but data management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation completenessVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments comprehensive user data into distinct evaluation categories with dedicated input objects for each category. This segmentation ensures complete data collection across all relevant dimensions while managing complexity through categorical organization and separate processing paths for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates universal evaluation frameworks and input objects that can process multiple types of user data through common processing mechanisms. This multi-functionality enables comprehensive data collection and evaluation while reducing management complexity through standardized processing routines applicable across different data types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240385939A1Methods, systems, and computer program products for data indexing and evaluation in distributed computing environments
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 INVESCO HLDG CO US INC
  • US20240385939A1 patent drawing
  • US20240385939A1 patent drawing
  • US20240385939A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer program products are provided for data indexing and evaluation in distributed computing environments. An example computer-implemented method includes receiving a request for data evaluation associated with a first user and generating one or more user input objects based upon the request that are associated with one or more evaluation categories. The computer-implemented method further includes causing presentation of the one or more user input objects to the first user and receiving one or more user inputs from the first user via the one or more user input objects. The computer-implemented method also includes determining one or more evaluation attributes associated with the first user based on the received one or more user inputs and generating an evaluation output indicative of a performance of the first user with respect to at least the one or more evaluation categories.