User Equipment Dual-PUSCH Scheduling with Variable PRB Allocation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing wireless communication systems lack flexibility and efficiency, particularly in handling diverse communication scenarios such as enhanced Mobile BroadBand (eMBB), massive Machine Type Communication (mMTC), and Ultra Reliable and Low Latency Communication (URLLC) within a single technology framework.
Innovation Solution
The implementation of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex (OFDM) with Cyclic Prefix (CP-OFDM) in downlink and Discrete Fourier Transform-spread-OFDM (DFT-s-OFDM) in uplink, along with resource grid configurations and carrier aggregation, enhances communication flexibility and efficiency by optimizing resource allocation and channel access procedures.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a single communication structure is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but communication flexibility and efficiency are limited
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic communication structures by allowing the network to switch between different communication modes (relay-based and direct) based on real-time conditions. The relay communication structure is activated when needed for extended coverage or improved reliability, while direct communication is used when conditions permit, creating a flexible adaptive system rather than a static single-structure approach
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a universal communication framework that can perform multiple functions through a single integrated system. The base station and relay devices can simultaneously handle both relay communication and direct communication tasks, and the system can adapt to serve different communication scenarios (eMBB, mMTC, URLLC) using the same infrastructure, thereby achieving versatility without proportionally increasing structural complexity
2Productivity
If resource allocation is optimized for specific scenarios, then efficiency for those scenarios improves, but adaptability to other scenarios decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent employs parameter changes by dynamically adjusting communication parameters such as resource allocation, modulation schemes, and relay selection based on the specific scenario requirements. For eMBB, resources are allocated to maximize throughput; for mMTC, parameters are optimized for massive device connectivity; for URLLC, parameters are adjusted to ensure low latency and high reliability. This allows the system to achieve high efficiency for each scenario while maintaining adaptability through parameter flexibility
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments resource allocation into scenario-specific configurations while maintaining a unified management framework. Different resource pools, transmission parameters, and relay configurations are prepared for different scenarios (eMBB, mMTC, URLLC), allowing the system to activate the appropriate segment for each communication type, thereby achieving both scenario-optimized efficiency and overall adaptability
Data Source
AI summary
Terminal device comprising: reception circuitry configured to receive a PDCCH scheduling a first PUSCH and a second PUSCH; and transmission circuitry configured to transmit the first PUSCH and/or the second PUSCH; and a number NPRB1 of PRBs is allocated to the first PUSCH and a number NPRB2 of PRBs which is different from the NPRB1 is allocated to the second PUSCH at least based on a FDRA field included in the PDCCH; wherein a size of a transport block is determined at least based on a baseline number NPRBbaseline of PRBs; and the NPRBbaseline is determined at least based on NPRB1 and NPRB2; and the transport block is included in the first PUSCH and the second PUSCH.