User Feedback System for Delivery Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current delivery devices, such as e-cigarettes, lack responsiveness to the user's state, including mood and subjective needs, which can affect the interaction and perceived utility of the device.

Innovation Solution

A user feedback system that includes an estimation processor to identify behavioral feedback actions based on user factors, such as neurological, physiological, contextual, and use-based data, and a feedback processor to modify device operations to alter the user's state, enhancing the device's responsiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the delivery device operates with fixed parameters, then the device structure is simple, but the device cannot respond to user state changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness to user stateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback loops where sensors continuously monitor user state (physiological signals, usage patterns) and transmit this information to processors that analyze the data and adjust delivery parameters in real-time. This creates a closed-loop system where the device responds dynamically to user needs, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity by making the complexity serve the feedback function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The delivery device autonomously monitors its own operation and the user's state through integrated sensors and processors, automatically adjusting parameters without external intervention. The system serves itself by collecting, analyzing, and acting on its own operational data and user feedback, reducing the need for manual control while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If the device collects and analyzes user data, then the personalization improves, but the data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoiddata processing automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The data processing function is segmented into multiple components: sensors collect raw data, local processors perform initial analysis and filtering, and cloud-based systems handle complex pattern recognition and long-term trend analysis. This segmentation distributes the processing burden across different levels, enabling comprehensive personalization without overwhelming a single processing unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary data processing and filtering at the sensor level before transmitting data to central processors. Basic analytics and feature extraction are conducted locally to reduce data volume and prepare information for higher-level analysis, reducing the overall processing burden while maintaining personalization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the device adjusts delivery parameters dynamically, then the user experience improves, but the control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The delivery device autonomously monitors its own operation and the user's state through integrated sensors and processors, automatically adjusting parameters without external intervention. The system serves itself by collecting, analyzing, and acting on its own operational data and user feedback, reducing the need for manual control while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where sensors continuously monitor user state (physiological signals, usage patterns) and transmit this information to processors that analyze the data and adjust delivery parameters in real-time. This creates a closed-loop system where the device responds dynamically to user needs, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity by making the complexity serve the feedback function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system improves the delivery device's responsiveness to the user's state, potentially leading to a more personalized and effective delivery of active ingredients, such as nicotine, by adjusting parameters like vaporization temperature and active ingredient concentration based on user feedback and data analysis.

Implementation Method 1

electrical power is supplied to the heating element to vaporize the aerosol source (a portion of the payload) in the vicinity of the heating element, to generate an aerosol for inhalation by the user

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

a heater having a heating element arranged to receive source liquid from the reservoir, for example through wicking / capillary action

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentUS20230301368A1User feedback system and method
Publication Date: 2023.09.28 NICOVENTURES TRADING LTD
  • US20230301368A1 patent drawing
  • US20230301368A1 patent drawing
  • US20230301368A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A user feedback system for a user of a delivery device within a delivery ecosystem includes an estimation processor adapted to identify at least a first feedback action based upon one or more user factors, the at least first feedback action including a behavioral feedback action for affecting at least a first behavior of the user, the feedback action being expected to alter a state of the user as indicated at least in part by the one or more user factors; and a feedback processor adapted to select at least a first identified feedback action, and to cause a modification of one or more operations of at least a first device within the delivery ecosystem, according to the selected at least first feedback action.