User Influence-Based Consensus Processing for Blockchain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current consensus processing methods for updating blockchain data, such as proof of work (POW), consume significant resources and energy, and existing influence quantification technologies lack accuracy in evaluating user influence across different fields and behaviors.

Innovation Solution

An information processing system that calculates a value indicating a user's influence and adjusts the difficulty level of consensus processing based on this value, using an influence evaluating apparatus to quantify user influence through ICs distributed based on various events and behaviors, and performs consensus processing on a peer-to-peer database.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If proof of work (POW) consensus processing is used to update blockchain data, then authenticity and tamper resistance of the peer-to-peer database are secured, but a huge amount of resources and energy are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthenticity of informationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for consensus from computational power (POW) to user influence value. Instead of requiring massive computational work to prove validity, the system uses pre-calculated influence values that reflect a user's actual impact on the network. This parameter change maintains security (users still need valid influence to participate) while dramatically reducing energy consumption during consensus operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculation of user influence values in advance, storing these values in the blockchain. During consensus processing, nodes simply reference these pre-calculated values rather than performing complex real-time calculations. This preliminary action separates the computationally intensive influence assessment from the time-critical consensus operation, reducing immediate energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If proof of work (POW) consensus processing is used to update blockchain data, then authenticity and tamper resistance of the peer-to-peer database are secured, but information resources are heavily consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper resistanceVSAvoidinformation resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the POW parameter (computational work) with an influence value parameter that quantifies a user's actual contribution and impact on the network. This change reduces information resource consumption because influence values are calculated once and reused, rather than requiring repeated computational proofs for each consensus operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and stores copies of user influence values in the blockchain, allowing multiple nodes to reference the same validated influence data without recalculating it. This copying approach eliminates redundant computation across the network, reducing overall information resource consumption while maintaining consensus integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If traditional consensus processing is used, then security is maintained, but processing efficiency is low due to high resource consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidconsensus processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the consensus parameter from computational intensity to influence-based validation. This enables faster consensus because nodes compare pre-stored influence values rather than performing resource-intensive proof verification, directly improving processing efficiency while maintaining security through the decentralized nature of influence value storage and verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical computational process of POW with a data-based validation process using influence values. Instead of mechanically performing repeated hashing and computational work, the system uses stored influence data to determine consensus outcomes, replacing a resource-heavy mechanical system with a more efficient information-based system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11388230B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US11388230B2 patent drawing
  • US11388230B2 patent drawing
  • US11388230B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To more appropriately perform a consensus processing regarding update of a peer-to-peer database.There is provided an information processing apparatus including: an acquiring unit that acquires a value indicating an influence of a user; and a consensus processing unit that performs consensus processing regarding update of a P2P database on the basis of the value indicating the influence.