User Readiness Evaluation Using Confidence Sliders and Weighted Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing employee training systems lack the ability to provide a comprehensive understanding of a user's knowledge and confidence levels, leading to inefficient training experiences that do not adapt to individual learning paces and needs.

Innovation Solution

A system that integrates confidence assessment tools, using confidence sliders to evaluate user responses, calculates weighted scores based on both correctness and confidence, and generates personalized reports to tailor training content in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional training assessment methods are used, then the assessment process is simple, but the understanding of user knowledge and confidence levels is incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assessment system is segmented into multiple independent components: confidence sliders for each answer choice, weighted score calculation modules, and proficiency level determination systems. This segmentation allows each component to be developed and validated independently while collectively providing comprehensive assessment data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-dimension assessment (correct/incorrect) to a multi-dimensional evaluation framework that incorporates both confidence levels and weighted scores. This dimensional expansion enables more nuanced measurement of user knowledge and understanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If personalized training adaptation is implemented, then learning efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning efficiencyVSAvoidtraining system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of user confidence and knowledge levels before delivering training content. This preliminary action enables the system to pre-adapt training materials to individual user needs, improving learning efficiency from the outset rather than requiring complex real-time adjustments throughout the training process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where assessment results directly inform subsequent training content selection and delivery. This feedback mechanism enables automatic personalization without requiring complex manual intervention, as the system self-adjusts based on measured user proficiency levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If confidence assessment is added to traditional testing, then user confidence levels are captured, but the assessment time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfidence level informationVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The confidence assessment is merged with the traditional multiple-choice question format by integrating confidence sliders directly into the answer selection interface. Users express both their answer choice and confidence level in a single unified interaction, capturing confidence information without requiring separate assessment steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system captures confidence information through self-service mechanisms where users automatically indicate their confidence levels as part of the natural answer selection process. This eliminates the need for separate confidence assessment procedures, as users provide the information themselves during routine interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250217914A1User readiness evaluation system
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 ADAPTIVEDGE READINESS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US20250217914A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217914A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217914A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, computer system, and computer program product are provided for performing user evaluations. An evaluation module is retrieved from a data repository. The evaluation module comprises a set of questions. Each question is presented with a number of answer choices in a graphic user interface. Each answer choice is associated with a respective confidence slider. Each confidence slider is operable to receive an input representing a user's confidence in an associated answer choice. A confidence factor is generated for each answer choice based on a position of the respective confidence slider for the associated answer choice. A weighted score is calculated for the question by scaling a question score by the confidence factor associated with a correct answer to the question. A report is generated based on the weighted score and the confidence factor associated with the correct answer.