User-Specific Phishing Lure Generation for Proactive Defense

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional anti-phishing systems are reactive, ineffective against sophisticated phishing attempts like spear phishing, and struggle to balance protection against false positives, often missing internally sourced threats and failing to anticipate future attacks.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that utilizes user-specific network behavior information to identify and generate tailored phishing lures and alerts, simulating phishing threats to improve user training and threat detection, dynamically updating alert presentation to avoid familiarization effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional email labeling and quarantine methods are used, then some phishing protection is achieved, but false positives increase and important emails may be blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephishing protectionVSAvoidfalse positives
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from uniform email filtering to user-specific behavior-based filtering. Each user's email interactions are analyzed individually, creating personalized protection rules that adapt to their specific work patterns and communication habits, thereby reducing false positives while maintaining protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively generates simulated phishing lures before actual attacks occur and uses them to train users in advance. This preliminary training enables users to recognize phishing patterns before encountering real threats, improving detection accuracy without increasing false positives in actual email filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If generic phishing campaigns are sent to all users, then bulk phishing training is provided, but sophisticated targeted phishing attempts remain ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining coverageVSAvoidphishing detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates customized phishing lures for each user based on their specific network behavior patterns, assets they interact with, and communication preferences. This personalized approach replaces generic campaigns, making phishing simulations realistic enough to train users against sophisticated targeted attacks while maintaining broad coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The phishing lures are dynamically generated in real-time based on current user behavior data rather than using static pre-designed templates. This dynamic adaptation allows the training content to evolve with changing user patterns and emerging phishing techniques, improving detection accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If reactive threat response is used, then known threats are addressed, but future undetected attacks cannot be anticipated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat responseVSAvoidfuture attack anticipation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors user network behavior and proactively generates simulated phishing lures based on predicted attack vectors before actual threats materialize. This preliminary action enables the organization to train against future attack patterns rather than merely reacting to known threats after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes continuous feedback loops where user responses to simulated phishing lures are analyzed and used to refine future lure generation. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt and improve its predictive capabilities, enhancing both threat response and future attack anticipation over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If users are repeatedly exposed to the same phishing alerts, then phishing awareness is reinforced, but the familiarization effect reduces alert effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephishing awarenessVSAvoidalert effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically varies phishing alert presentations by changing visual characteristics, delivery timing, and content formatting based on user responses and behavior patterns. This dynamic variation prevents users from developing familiarization effects while maintaining reinforcement of phishing awareness through diverse alert experiences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12047416B1Intelligent anti-phishing management
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 COPPERFASTEN TECH LTD
  • US12047416B1 patent drawing
  • US12047416B1 patent drawing
  • US12047416B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for monitoring, evaluating protection against, improving protection against, and simulating phishing threats. Network usage information for users of an organization can be leveraged to determine user-specific network behavior information. This user-specific network behavior information can then be leveraged to better identify incoming threats as well as generate and deploy user-specific phishing lures. Phishing simulation campaigns can be conducted, including by implementing variations in how the phishing lures are presented. Such campaigns can be scored to determine how different presentation variations perform. User-specific phishing lures can be generated using user environment information collected by an agent running on the user's device. Alerts informing users of potential threats can be dynamically updated with different presentation parameters to improve performance. Digital communications identified as threats can be used to generate hashes to speedily identify subsequent digital communications that are threats.