User-Specific Threat Protection Using Network Zone Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network security systems fail to detect personalized or business-specific threats due to limited analysis time, lack of user context, and insufficient computing resources, leading to missed detections and vulnerabilities in network endpoints and browsers.

Innovation Solution

A cloud-based threat analysis system with user identity integration provides personalized threat detection by analyzing online behavior and establishing protection zones, performing continuous scans, and integrating with browsers to block threats before they occur.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional security systems perform comprehensive threat analysis, then detection accuracy is improved, but analysis time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the web page into multiple zones (e.g., header, body, footer, sidebar) and analyzes each zone separately for zone-specific threats. This segmentation allows comprehensive analysis to be performed in parallel across different regions, improving detection accuracy without proportionally increasing total analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis by establishing user profiles, group memberships, and threat intelligence databases before actual threat detection occurs. Historical data about user behavior, trusted zones, and known threats is pre-processed and stored, enabling faster real-time decisions during actual web browsing without requiring comprehensive re-analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If security systems provide personalized threat detection for each user, then detection relevance is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection relevanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal security framework that serves multiple functions through a single integrated architecture. The same zone analysis engine handles both user-specific personalized threats and group-level organizational threats, eliminating the need for separate complex systems for each function while maintaining high detection relevance for all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by tailoring security parameters and threat criteria to specific user contexts, groups, or organizations without requiring complete system reconfiguration. Each user or group receives customized threat protection parameters while sharing the same core infrastructure, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If comprehensive threat analysis is performed on all network destinations, then security coverage is improved, but computing resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by analyzing only the specific zones or regions of web pages that are relevant to current user profiles and threat intelligence, rather than uniformly analyzing every element of every destination. This selective analysis maintains comprehensive security coverage for high-risk areas while reducing computing resources spent on low-risk or irrelevant zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering and classification of network destinations based on user profiles, group memberships, and threat intelligence before full analysis. Destinations are pre-sorted by risk level and relevance, allowing the system to allocate computing resources to high-priority targets first and apply lighter analysis to lower-priority destinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250358299A1User and group specific threat protection system and method
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • US20250358299A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358299A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358299A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of managing access to a network destination. The method includes establishing a first network zone for a user, the first network zone including a plurality of network destinations. The first network zone is monitored and one or more changes in the first network zone are determined. A first network destination in the first network zone is analyzed responsive to determining the one or more changes in the first network zone to determine a first threat. An attempt by the user to access the first network destination is detected, and access by the user to the first network destination is restricted based on the determining the first threat.