Automatic USPS Delivery Failure Tracking and Refund Reporting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current process for managing USPS delivery guarantees is cumbersome, especially for enterprises that send multiple parcels, as it requires manual tracking of delivery dates against guaranteed dates, often leading to undetected delivery failures and a labor-intensive refund application process.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automatic tracking and reporting of USPS delivery guarantee failures, which periodically analyzes digital scanning events to detect non-delivery by the guaranteed date, providing online or email notifications to users and facilitating automated refund requests to the USPS.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual tracking of delivery dates is used, then users can monitor parcel delivery status, but the process becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery guarantee monitoringVSAvoidtime for tracking and refund application
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors delivery status by periodically analyzing digital scanning events from USPS, compares actual delivery dates against guaranteed dates, and generates refund applications without human intervention. This self-service approach eliminates manual tracking efforts while maintaining reliable delivery guarantee monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives feedback from USPS scanning events and automatically adjusts its monitoring and refund processes. By implementing feedback loops that track delivery status in real-time and trigger automated refund applications when guarantees are violated, the system reduces time loss while maintaining reliable monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automated tracking system is implemented, then tracking efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the USPS's existing digital scanning events as an intermediary data source rather than building a complete tracking infrastructure from scratch. By leveraging the intermediary scanning data already generated by USPS operations, the system achieves high tracking efficiency while minimizing the complexity of data collection and processing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If periodic analysis of scanning events is performed, then delivery failures are detected accurately, but processing time and resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery failure detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources for analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs periodic analysis of scanning events at optimized intervals rather than continuously monitoring every event. This periodic approach maintains high detection accuracy for delivery failures while significantly reducing computational resource consumption compared to continuous analysis, achieving the right balance between precision and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9747577B1Automatic guarantee delivery tracking and reporting for United States Postal Service postage refunds for paid computer-based postage
Publication Date: 2017.08.29 AUCTANE INC
  • US9747577B1 patent drawing
  • US9747577B1 patent drawing
  • US9747577B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various exemplary embodiments of the present invention will provide methods and systems for automatic tracking and reporting of refunds for parcels for which the United States Postage Service (the “USPS”) fails to provide delivery to the designated delivery address by a guaranteed delivery date. Various embodiments of the present invention will automatically detect a parcel for which a delivery date has been guaranteed, but for which the USPS failed to make delivery by the guaranteed delivery date. For such guaranteed delivery failures, various embodiments of the present invention will display an online report to the user, or will send an electronic report of the failure, such as by electronic mail (“email”), to the user that printed the corresponding USPS Express Mail postage, or will otherwise notify the user of, or make available to the user information regarding, such failures. Various embodiments of the present invention will automatically and periodically analyze electronic and/or digital scanning events provided by the USPS regarding postage printed by users that used the subject Internet postage provider to print Express Mail Postage with a corresponding USPS Express Mail Label Number. Various embodiments of the present invention will automatically and periodically analyze such electronic and/or digital scanning events in order to determine whether a scanned tracking event indicates a delivery corresponding to postage printed by a user using the subject Internet postage provider and in order, then, to determine whether the actual delivery date and/or time, if delivered, exceeds the guaranteed delivery and/or time.