Utility-Controlled On-Site Energy Storage Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing on-site energy storage systems for renewable energy systems face issues such as waste, high demand spikes, expensive electricity, lack of coordinated control, and uncertainty for utility providers due to consumer ownership and control, leading to challenges in optimizing energy use and accessing energy during demand response periods.

Innovation Solution

Installing on-site energy storage systems on the utility company's side of the billing meter, allowing utility providers to control the use of stored energy, reducing costs for consumers, and enabling coordinated remote control of multiple systems to meet grid demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If consumers own and control on-site energy storage systems, then consumers can have power during outages and store surplus energy, but utility providers face uncertainty regarding energy availability making it difficult to plan for demand response events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower availability during outagesVSAvoidenergy availability information for utility planning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary control system that mediates between consumer-owned energy storage systems and utility providers. This intermediary enables utility providers to access and control energy storage systems remotely, obtaining real-time information about energy availability and the ability to dispatch stored energy during demand response events, while consumers retain ownership and continue to have power during outages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If on-site energy storage systems are installed to store surplus renewable energy, then waste of unused energy is reduced, but coordinated control of multiple systems is lacking preventing optimization of stored energy use and grid congestion prevention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewaste of unused stored energyVSAvoidcoordinated control of multiple storage systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple distributed energy storage systems into a coordinated network under unified utility provider control. By aggregating these systems and implementing centralized coordination, the patent enables optimized energy dispatch across the entire network, preventing grid congestion and maximizing the utilization of stored energy resources while maintaining individual system autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If consumers install on-site storage systems to avoid grid congestion by storing surplus energy, then grid congestion is reduced, but electricity becomes more expensive for all including the electric company

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid congestionVSAvoidcost of electricity for utility provider
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by enabling utility providers to proactively manage energy storage systems before demand response events or peak demand periods occur. The system pre-coordinates energy storage and discharge schedules, allowing utilities to optimize energy procurement and reduce the need for expensive peak-generation resources, thereby reducing overall electricity costs while preventing grid congestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If on-site energy storage systems are installed on the consumer side of the billing meter, then consumers control stored energy use, but utility providers cannot access energy from these systems during demand response periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer control over stored energyVSAvoidutility access to stored energy for demand response
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by creating a flexible, adaptive control architecture that dynamically shifts operational control between consumers and utility providers based on system needs. Consumers maintain default control for routine operations and outage protection, while the system automatically transitions to utility-controlled mode during demand response events, enabling seamless adaptation to different operational scenarios without compromising either consumer autonomy or utility access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11381090B2Systems and methods for dynamic control of distributed energy resource systems
Publication Date: 2022.07.05 ATMA ENERGY INC
  • US11381090B2 patent drawing
  • US11381090B2 patent drawing
  • US11381090B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to systems and methods for dynamic control of distributed energy resource systems. The disclosed systems and methods provide the ability for coordinated, real-time, and pre-planned control of a network of distributed energy resource systems where each distributed energy resource system is located at a different consumer site. Each distributed energy resource system is operable to provide stored and/or generated energy to meet on-site consumer needs and/or provide energy to the grid. An off-site control system obtains energy usage information from a plurality of the distributed energy resource systems and processes the information in order to coordinate control of each distributed energy resource system such as coordinating if and when each distributed energy resource system provides energy to the grid in order to at least partially meet energy demands associated with a demand response timeframe.