Side-by-Side Utility Vehicle Frame Rigidity and Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current side-by-side utility vehicles lack enhanced structural rigidity and passenger safety features, and there is a need for improved seating arrangements and powertrain configurations to accommodate multiple passengers and cargo effectively across various terrains.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a robust frame with cross-members for increased rigidity, a powertrain assembly with an engine and transmission, and a seating arrangement for at least two passengers in a side-by-side configuration, along with a roll cage assembly and air intake system, supported by a frame that includes a hood, side panels, and a dashboard assembly, enhancing structural integrity and passenger safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a robust frame with cross-members is incorporated, then structural rigidity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidframe complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into multiple cross-members that segment the frame structure into rigid sections. These cross-members are positioned at strategic locations to provide structural support and rigidity while maintaining manufacturability through modular construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a roll cage assembly is added, then passenger safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The roll cage assembly is integrated with the frame structure, merging the safety function into the existing structural framework. This combination provides passenger protection while avoiding the need for completely separate structural systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If seating for multiple passengers in side-by-side arrangement is provided, then passenger capacity and safety are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidseating arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seating structure serves multiple functions: it provides side-by-side seating for multiple passengers, integrates with the roll cage for safety, and incorporates seat belts and restraint systems. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate safety components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If a powertrain assembly with engine and transmission is incorporated, then power delivery efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery efficiencyVSAvoidpowertrain complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The powertrain assembly merges the engine and transmission into an integrated unit that is directly coupled to the ground engaging members. This integration streamlines power delivery while reducing the number of separate components and connections required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9540052B2Side-by-side vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.01.10 POLARIS IND INC
  • US9540052B2 patent drawing
  • US9540052B2 patent drawing
  • US9540052B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A utility vehicle includes a plurality of ground-engaging members, a frame assembly supported by the plurality of ground-engaging members, and a powertrain assembly. Additionally, the utility vehicle includes a body generally surrounding the frame assembly and including a hood, dashboard assembly, and a side panel.