Utility Warranty Tool for IT Stack Service Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IT solution architectures face challenges in adequately designing IT infrastructure to support complex business processes due to increasing software and hardware complexity, particularly in distributed environments, where there is no uniform method to compare resource sharing across IT infrastructure layers.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for comparing utility and warranty of services in an IT stack by determining required and available utility and warranty values at each layer, using a utility and warranty tool to assess whether services satisfy desired business process solutions, with a determination component calculating these values and a comparison component evaluating their alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional solution development techniques are used to design IT infrastructure, then the design process is manageable, but the ability to adequately design IT infrastructure for complex business processes deteriorates due to increasing software and hardware complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIT infrastructure complexityVSAvoiddesign adequacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the IT infrastructure into multiple layers (hardware layer, software layer, service layer, business process layer) and introduces layer-specific metrics (utility at service layer, warranty at hardware layer). This segmentation allows manageable analysis of complex systems by breaking them into independent evaluable components, resolving the contradiction between managing complexity and maintaining design adequacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If resources are integrated and shared within an IT implementation, then resource efficiency improves, but the difficulty of determining how well IT infrastructure satisfies service requirements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidservice requirement satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces RUW values as intermediary metrics that bridge service requirements and hardware capabilities. The utility metric mediates between service layer requirements and software layer capabilities, while the warranty metric mediates between software layer promises and hardware layer capabilities. These intermediaries enable measurement of service requirement satisfaction even in integrated resource environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple service components are composed to deliver end-service, then service functionality improves, but the configuration and deployment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice functionalityVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a new dimension of evaluation by introducing layer-specific RUW metrics (utility at service layer, warranty at hardware layer) rather than using traditional single-dimension performance metrics. This dimensional change enables systematic comparison and configuration of multiple service components by evaluating them across distinct functional layers, reducing configuration complexity while maintaining service functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10713606B2Comparing utility and warranty of services
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10713606B2 patent drawing
  • US10713606B2 patent drawing
  • US10713606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An invention for comparing utility and warranty of services in an information (IT) stack is provided. Embodiments of this invention are directed to comparing utility and warranty of services in an information technology (IT) stack comprising a plurality of layers, at least one of the plurality of layers having a set of services. In these embodiments, a utility and warranty tool provides this capability. Specifically, the utility and warranty tool comprises a determination component configured to determine, at each layer of the IT stack, a required utility and warranty (RUW) value for each of the set of services, wherein the RUW value represents a desired solution for implementing a business process; and determine, at each layer of the IT stack, an available utility and warranty (AUW) value for each of the set of services, wherein the AUW value is a measure of an ability of each of the set of services to satisfy the RUW at each layer of the IT stack. The utility and warranty tool further comprises a comparison component configured to compare the RUW value against the AUW value at each layer of the IT stack to determine whether each of the set of services satisfies the desired solution for implementing the business process.