Utilization-Aware Hybrid Scheduling for Heterogeneous Processors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional thread scheduling policies in heterogeneous processor systems fail to accurately allocate tasks due to a lack of awareness of accelerator processor utilization, leading to inefficient power consumption and responsiveness in specific utilization scenarios, particularly when accelerator processors are dominant.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid scheduling approach that dynamically switches between two scheduling policies based on the utilization of CPU cores and accelerator processors, using system management unit feedback to optimize task allocation and reduce power consumption while maintaining responsiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single scheduling policy is used in heterogeneous processor systems, then the scheduling implementation is simple, but the system fails to accurately allocate tasks and optimize power consumption in different utilization scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling implementation complexityVSAvoidtask allocation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic scheduling system that transitions between different scheduling policies based on system state. The hybrid scheduler monitors accelerator utilization and CPU core utilization, switching between frequency-based scheduling (when accelerators are underutilized) and priority-based scheduling (when accelerators are overloaded), thereby adapting the scheduling approach to current system conditions to optimize both task allocation accuracy and power efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes scheduling parameters dynamically based on utilization metrics. When accelerator utilization exceeds a threshold, the scheduler transitions from using frequency information to using priority information for task allocation. This parameter change allows the system to optimize task allocation accuracy for different workload conditions without requiring a completely different scheduling implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If frequency-based scheduling is used to optimize power consumption, then energy efficient cores can be utilized for background tasks, but the system lacks awareness of accelerator processor utilization leading to suboptimal power efficiency in accelerator-dominant scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidaccelerator utilization awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The hybrid scheduler incorporates feedback from accelerator utilization monitoring to adjust scheduling decisions. By continuously monitoring accelerator processor utilization and CPU core utilization, the system receives feedback about system state and adjusts its scheduling policy accordingly, switching between frequency-based and priority-based scheduling to optimize power consumption based on actual accelerator workload conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The hybrid scheduler acts as an intermediary layer between the task queue and the heterogeneous processor cores. It receives task requests, evaluates current system state including accelerator utilization, and mediates task allocation by selecting appropriate scheduling policies and matching tasks to suitable cores, thereby bridging the information gap between accelerator utilization status and scheduling decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If priority-based scheduling is used to maintain system responsiveness, then high priority tasks can be executed promptly, but the system fails to optimize power consumption by utilizing energy efficient cores for lower priority tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem responsivenessVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling system segments task allocation into different strategies based on priority levels and system state. High priority tasks receive immediate attention through priority-based scheduling to maintain responsiveness, while lower priority tasks are allocated to energy-efficient cores using frequency-based scheduling to optimize power consumption. This segmentation allows the system to simultaneously address both responsiveness and energy efficiency requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250278293A1Hybrid Scheduling for Heterogeneous Processor Systems
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US20250278293A1 patent drawing
  • US20250278293A1 patent drawing
  • US20250278293A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Hybrid scheduling for heterogeneous processor systems is described. In one or more implementations, a system includes a central processing unit having multiple cores of at least two different core types, one or more accelerator processors, and a system management processor. The system management processor is configured to update a scheduling policy implemented by an operating system of the central processing unit from a first scheduling policy to a second scheduling policy based on a utilization of the multiple cores and/or the one or more accelerator processors. The update enables the system management processor to control task scheduling.