Utterance Analysis Apparatus Distinguishing Simple Responses from Statements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for analyzing discussion activity in groups only consider speech duration and not the content of utterances, making it impossible to determine the type of speech, such as simple responses or statements.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that extracts utterances from voice data, determines utterance periods, and identifies simple responses and statements based on predetermined time periods and keywords, storing the results along with frequent keywords for analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If only speech duration is used for calculation, then the calculation is simple, but the type of utterance cannot be determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation complexityVSAvoidutterance type information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The speech analysis is segmented into multiple dimensions: duration-based classification (simple response vs. statement) and content-based analysis (keyword extraction). This segmentation allows the system to process different aspects of speech separately, maintaining simplicity in duration analysis while adding content analysis to capture utterance type information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from one-dimensional duration analysis to two-dimensional analysis by adding content/keyword dimension. Utterances are classified first by duration (temporal dimension) and then enriched with keyword information (semantic dimension), enabling determination of utterance types without significantly increasing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of information

If speech content is analyzed in addition to duration, then utterance type can be determined, but the calculation becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveutterance type informationVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis is divided into independent modules: duration detection module, keyword extraction module, and classification module. Each module handles a specific aspect, allowing the system to incorporate content analysis without creating a monolithic complex system. The segmentation enables parallel processing and independent optimization of each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs multiple functions using the same processed data: duration-based classification, keyword extraction, and utterance type determination. By making the speech processing system multi-functional, it extracts maximum information from the input data without requiring separate processing pipelines, thereby managing complexity while providing comprehensive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If only speech period is used, then the measurement is simple, but the discussion dynamics cannot be fully understood

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement simplicityVSAvoiddiscussion dynamics information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Discussion dynamics are segmented into quantifiable metrics: speech duration, keyword frequency, and utterance type distribution. Each metric captures a different aspect of discussion dynamics, allowing the system to maintain measurement simplicity while providing comprehensive insights into group interactions through multiple independent measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds semantic dimensions to the temporal measurements. While speech period provides temporal information, keyword extraction and utterance type classification add semantic dimensions, enabling a more complete understanding of discussion dynamics without sacrificing the simplicity of temporal analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11282518B2Information processing apparatus that determines whether utterance of person is simple response or statement
Publication Date: 2022.03.22 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11282518B2 patent drawing
  • US11282518B2 patent drawing
  • US11282518B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus as an image forming apparatus includes an utterance period detecting section, a simple response/statement determining section, and an HDD. The utterance period detecting section detects utterance periods of utterances of each person from voice data. The simple response/statement determining section converts the voice data to a text, determines, when the utterance in the detected utterance period falling within a first period contains any predetermined keyword, that the utterance is a simple response, determines the utterance made for a second period longer than the first period to be a statement, and extracts, for each person, a frequent keyword appearing a predetermined number of times or more in the utterances. The HDD stores determination results of the simple response/statement determining section, the utterance periods for the simple responses, and the utterance periods for the statements, together with the frequent keyword.