UWB Vehicle Ranging Priority Control for Conflict-Free Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle access systems using UWB ToF for distance determination face challenges with resource conflicts and high failure rates of ranging results, leading to delayed responses and unwanted system behaviors.

Innovation Solution

A prioritization instance is implemented to assign priority codes to vehicle transceivers based on situational criteria, such as recently determined distances and ownership, to manage message prioritization and avoid resource conflicts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple UWB communications run simultaneously, then system functionality is improved, but resource conflicts occur and message failure rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidmessage failure rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future message arrivals and resource conflicts before they occur. The prediction unit forecasts when resource conflicts will happen based on current ranging session parameters, allowing the system to proactively adjust message scheduling and prioritize critical communications before failures occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts message prioritization and scheduling based on real-time conditions. The prediction unit continuously monitors ranging session parameters and updates predictions, allowing the system to adapt message handling strategies dynamically rather than using static prioritization rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the vehicle transceiver switches between UWB ranging sessions to avoid conflicts, then resource conflicts are reduced, but response time increases and latency occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource conflict reductionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system predicts resource conflicts in advance and prepares prioritization strategies before conflicts occur. By forecasting when conflicts will happen based on current session parameters, the system can pre-arrange message scheduling to minimize switching delays and maintain faster response times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different prioritization levels to different messages based on their specific importance and timing requirements. Critical messages receive higher priority handling while less critical communications can be deferred, allowing the system to optimize response time for important functions without completely avoiding session switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If prioritization based on situational criteria is implemented, then message failure rate is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage failure rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from the prediction unit about anticipated resource conflicts to dynamically adjust message prioritization. The prediction outcomes feed back into the message scheduling mechanism, creating a closed-loop system that automatically adapts prioritization based on predicted conditions rather than requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically predicting resource conflicts and adjusting message prioritization without external intervention. The prediction unit and prioritization mechanism work autonomously based on current ranging session parameters, reducing the need for complex external control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces message failure rates and improves response times by ensuring that critical messages are prioritized, thereby enhancing the reliability and efficiency of vehicle access systems.

Implementation Method 1

determining in each case a distance value, representing a distance between a vehicle transceiver of a vehicle and one of a plurality of mobile device transceivers, by interchanging messages

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of Flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentUS20250076485A1Methods and devices for prioritizing an in particular UWB-based distance determination
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US20250076485A1 patent drawing
  • US20250076485A1 patent drawing
  • US20250076485A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is an apparatus for determining at least one distance value, representing a distance between a vehicle transceiver of a vehicle and one of a plurality of mobile device transceivers, by interchanging messages, wherein at least one vehicle transceiver is configured, to prioritize, according to predefined priorities, one or more messages from a first mobile device transceiver over one or more messages from at least one other mobile device transceiver.