Separable Sheet Material With V-Channel Tearable Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing printable sheet materials, such as envelopes and packaging, face difficulties in easy and damage-free separation due to weak tearable cut designs that often catch on processing equipment or result in unpredictable tearing paths, leading to inefficiencies and damage during opening or separation.

Innovation Solution

The development of a separable structure with customized tearable lines and connectors, including overlapping or intersecting cut patterns, that ensure controlled tearing along a desired path, reducing the number of cuts required and enhancing the strength and reliability of the opening mechanism, allowing for easy and intuitive separation without equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If close linear spacing of tearable line patterns is used, then the tearable line becomes weak, but the separation becomes easier

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of separationVSAvoidstrength of tearable line
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The tearable line is divided into multiple discrete cut patterns spaced apart from each other, creating individual tear segments rather than a continuous weak line. This segmentation allows the material to tear cleanly at each cut point while maintaining overall structural integrity where cuts are not present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cut patterns are strategically positioned at specific locations along the tearable line rather than uniformly distributed. This creates local weakening points that guide the tear path while preserving strength in adjacent areas, allowing controlled separation without compromising the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If curved or L-shaped cut patterns are used, then the tearable line becomes stronger, but the design catches on inserting or processing equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength of tearable lineVSAvoidcatching on equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using curved or L-shaped patterns that follow the contour of the tear path, the invention uses straight linear cut patterns that are simpler in form. This inversion of the approach eliminates the complexity that causes equipment catching while still achieving the desired tear path through strategic positioning of multiple linear cuts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous curved or L-shaped cut pattern is segmented into multiple discrete linear cut sections. This segmentation simplifies each individual cut element, reducing the likelihood of equipment catching on complex curved edges while maintaining the overall tear path through proper spacing and arrangement of the linear segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If variable forces are applied during separation, then the tearing path becomes unpredictable, but the separation adapts to different handling methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to handling methodsVSAvoidprecision of tearing path
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cut patterns are pre-positioned and pre-configured in specific locations and orientations before the separation action occurs. This preliminary arrangement of cuts guides the tear path in advance, ensuring that regardless of the force direction or handling method, the tear follows the predetermined path defined by the cut locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cut patterns are strategically placed at critical locations along the desired tear path, creating local failure points that redirect the tear. This localized positioning ensures that even when variable forces are applied, the tear is channeled through the pre-determined cut locations, maintaining precision while accommodating different handling methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If gaps or connectors are spaced apart to provide strength, then the connection becomes stronger, but the tearing path control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength of connectionVSAvoidprecision of tearing path
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The connection structure is segmented into discrete cut patterns with controlled spacing, creating a series of weak points rather than a continuous structure. This segmentation allows the connectors to maintain strength through their uncut portions while the spaced cuts provide predetermined failure points that guide the tear path through the connection area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cut patterns are locally positioned at specific points within the connector regions rather than uniformly distributed. This creates localized weakening points that control the tear path through the connectors while leaving the majority of the connector material intact, preserving overall connection strength while enabling precise tear path control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10144241B2Separable or opening portions for printable sheet material
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 EMMOTT CHARLES E
  • US10144241B2 patent drawing
  • US10144241B2 patent drawing
  • US10144241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printable sheet material includes a panel having an integral separable portion and a starting mechanism formed on the separable portion. At least two tearable lines are formed in the panel permitting the separable portion to be at least partially separated from a remaining portion of the panel by tearing in either of opposite directions. Each tearable line includes a plurality of open ā€œVā€ channeling cuts spaced along the line, each of the channeling cuts formed by a pair of converging cuts having a wider spaced end and a narrower spaced end. The channeling cuts are oriented with the wider spaced ends facing toward the starting mechanism and the narrower spaced ends pointed in a tearing direction extending away from the starting mechanism. The channeling cuts of the two lines share one of the converging cuts.