V-Pole Holder With Tensioned Arms for Shadow-Free Backdrops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanisms for holding and positioning backdrops, screens, and graphics in the photographic industry face limitations in maximum length/width, vertical hanging, and shadow casting, with grips causing issues when materials are removed.

Innovation Solution

A V-Pole holder with variable-length arms connected by an elbow with a tensioning mechanism that allows for adjustable positioning and secure grasping, enabling the holding of flexible materials without casting shadows, and featuring a floor stand and clamps for secure attachment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional spreader arms are used to hold backdrops and screens, then the material can be supported, but the arms cast shadows and obstruct the camera view

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial support capabilityVSAvoidshadow casting and view obstruction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The holder is divided into two separate arms that can be positioned independently on either side of the light source, rather than using a single centralized support structure. This segmentation allows the arms to be placed in positions that do not interfere with the camera view or cast shadows on the backdrop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary positioning system where the arms are held at specific distances from the light source using adjustable mechanisms. This intermediary positioning ensures the arms support the material without directly blocking the light path or camera view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If fixed-length arms are used in the holder, then the structure is simple, but the range of flexible material dimensions that can be handled is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidrange of material dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The arms are made adjustable in length rather than fixed, allowing the holder to adapt to different sizes of backdrops, screens, and graphics. The adjustable length mechanism enables the same device to handle a wide range of material dimensions while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The holder is designed with universal adaptability through adjustable arm lengths and configurable tensioning mechanisms, allowing it to serve multiple functions across different applications and material sizes, rather than requiring separate devices for each dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Shape

If tensioning mechanism is engaged to press arms apart, then the material is stretched flat, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial flatnessVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tensioning mechanism is designed to automatically engage and create outward pressure on the arms when the holder is assembled, eliminating the need for separate manual tensioning operations. The springs self-generate the necessary force to keep the arms pressed apart and the material stretched flat.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex manual tensioning systems with simple spring-loaded mechanisms that automatically provide the necessary outward pressure. This substitution simplifies the overall structure while maintaining the ability to stretch and flatten the material effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Strength

If grips are used to secure material to the holder, then the material is held firmly, but the grips cause problems when material needs to be removed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidmaterial removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping mechanism is designed to be easily extractable or removable from the arms, allowing the material to be quickly released and removed without dealing with permanent or difficult-to-open grips. The grips can be detached separately from the main holder structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11359762B2V-pole holder for light modifiers
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 SAVAGE PAPER SPECIALTIES LLC
  • US11359762B2 patent drawing
  • US11359762B2 patent drawing
  • US11359762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A holder for flexible materials which incorporate two arms connected by an elbow. Within the elbow is a tensioning mechanism which, when engaged, tends to press the arm apart. When the tension is released, the holder collapses into an easily stored mechanism. With the arms being variable in length, the range of material dimensions is greatly enhanced. A connector positioned at the elbow permits the holder to be secured to a base and arranged in gangs to address the particular need at the time.