V-Type Engine Blow-By Separator Layout Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In V-type internal combustion engines, the limited space between banks poses challenges in arranging oil separators effectively, compromising blow-by processing performance and mountability due to the need for efficient oil mist separation and discharge.

Innovation Solution

Optimizing the layout of three separators by placing a large-capacity first separator in the bank where the crankshaft rotates upward and smaller second and third separators in juxtaposition in the bank where it rotates downward, eliminating the need for a third separator in the limited inter-bank space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separators are provided in all three gas routes, then oil mist separation performance is improved, but the device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil mist separation performanceVSAvoidnumber of separators
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the separator from one of the gas routes (specifically the third gas route connected to throttle downstream part) and eliminates it, relying on the separators in the first two gas routes to handle the blow-by gases. This reduces the total number of separators from three to two, simplifying the device while maintaining adequate separation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the function of oil mist separation for all three gas routes into just two separators - one separator handles the combined blow-by gases from the first and second gas routes, while the third gas route does not require a separate separator. This merging of functions reduces component count and simplifies the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If three separators are arranged in the limited space between banks, then oil separability is maintained, but the ease of manufacture and assembly deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil separabilityVSAvoidmountability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the requirement for a separator in the third gas route, extracting this component from the system. This eliminates the need to fit three separators into the constrained inter-bank space, significantly improving ease of manufacture and assembly while maintaining adequate oil separation capability through the remaining two separators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If a large-capacity separator is installed in the first bank, then oil discharge performance is improved, but the volume of the device increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil discharge performanceVSAvoidseparator capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing a large-capacity separator specifically in the first bank where blow-by gases with higher oil content are present, while using a smaller or no separator in the third gas route where oil content is lower. This targeted approach ensures adequate oil discharge performance where needed without unnecessarily increasing overall device volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures desired blow-by processing performance and improved mountability by securing sufficient separator capacity and space efficiency, maintaining oil separability and discharge performance without sacrificing performance.

Implementation Method 1

a first separator, a second separator, and a third separator, each of which has a function that separates oil mist from blow-by gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational settling: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

By the way, in the first bank arranged on a side where a crankshaft rotates upward from a bottom, rotary motion of the crankshaft causes an upward airflow directed from the crankcase toward the first separator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP2905438B1Device for processing blow-by from v-type internal combustion engines
Publication Date: 2017.07.12 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • EP2905438B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2905438B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2905438B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

It is an object of the invention to improve space efficiency, while ensuring a desired blow-by gas processing performance. As gas routes that connect a crankcase (18) and each of intake passages, a first gas route (31) and a second gas route (32) connected to respective throttle upstream parts of the intake passages on the upstream side of each throttle valve (27) for each bank (VA, VB), and a third gas route (33) connected to a throttle downstream part of the intake passage for one of the banks are provided. Separators (34-36), each of which has a function that separates oil mist from blow-by gas, are disposed in the respective gas routes (31-33). Only the first separator (34) is disposed in the first bank (VA) on the side where a crankshaft rotates upward from the bottom. The second separator (35) and the third separator (36) are both disposed in the second bank (VB) arranged on the side where the crankshaft rotates downward from the top and placed in juxtaposition with each other.