Decentralized V2V Message Validation for Data Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle-to-X communication systems require central infrastructure for authentication and data security, which can be vulnerable and limit the ability to maintain anonymity and prevent information falsification without external intervention.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized vehicle-to-vehicle communication system where each communication device can autonomously check messages for adherence to specific rules and trigger transmitter shutdowns if errors are detected, eliminating the need for a central control unit and ensuring data security through cooperative network monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a central infrastructure is used for authentication and data security, then data security can be maintained through centralized control, but the system complexity increases and anonymity cannot be fully preserved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the authentication and security verification functions from the central infrastructure and distributes them to individual communication devices. Each device now performs its own message validation and can independently verify rule compliance, eliminating the need for centralized authentication while maintaining security through decentralized peer-to-peer verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Communication devices are equipped with the capability to autonomously check received messages against predefined rules, validate message integrity, and trigger shutdown signals for non-compliant senders without external intervention. This self-service approach allows each participant to maintain its own security posture while preserving anonymity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If centralized control is implemented for message validation, then information falsification can be prevented, but the ability to maintain anonymity and operate without external intervention is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of information falsificationVSAvoidanonymity and independent operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The validation and anti-falsification capabilities are extracted from the centralized controller and embedded in each communication device. Participants can independently verify message authenticity and detect falsification attempts through rule-based checking, maintaining anonymity while preventing information manipulation through distributed verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If each communication device performs autonomous message checking, then data security is enhanced without central infrastructure, but the computational load and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidmessage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of performing exhaustive validation of all message aspects, the system implements targeted rule-based checking that focuses on critical security parameters. This partial action approach provides sufficient security verification while minimizing processing overhead and time loss, balancing security requirements with operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2415242B1Data security for communication by coequal participants
Publication Date: 2019.05.08 CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO OHG
  • EP2415242B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a communication device for a participant of a communication network of coequal participants having a communication unit and a control unit. The received messages are evaluated in regards to a rule conformity. If a message does not correspond to a certain rule, a deactivation signal is sent to the sender of the message.