V2X Link Scheduling by UL-SL Priority Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current V2X communication mechanisms fail to balance data transmission requirements such as latency and reliability on both SL and UL, and do not resolve transmission conflicts between services on different links.

Innovation Solution

A communication method that prioritizes UL or SL transmission based on parameter values such as PPPP or priority levels, allowing for accurate determination of transmission priorities by comparing parameter values to determine whether UL or SL MAC PDUs are preferentially transmitted.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If device-side autonomous actions are introduced to improve responsiveness, then user experience is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments autonomous actions into distinct types (initiated vs. triggered) with different authorization requirements. Initiated actions require explicit user authorization, while triggered actions operate with implicit authorization based on predefined conditions. This segmentation allows the system to implement autonomous functionality without requiring complex authorization logic for every action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary authorization setup by defining authorized triggered actions and their conditions in advance. Users configure which actions should be automatically triggered and under what conditions, rather than authorizing each action in real-time. This preliminary configuration reduces runtime complexity while maintaining user control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If autonomous actions are executed without confirmation, then responsiveness is improved, but user control is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresponsivenessVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic authorization where the system adapts its confirmation requirements based on the action type and context. High-risk actions require explicit user confirmation, while routine actions can execute automatically based on predefined conditions. This dynamic approach allows responsiveness to be optimized for appropriate actions while maintaining user control for critical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback mechanisms that inform users about triggered actions and their outcomes. Users can review logs of automatic actions and adjust their authorization preferences based on observed system behavior. This feedback loop maintains user control while enabling autonomous execution for appropriate actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3826356B1Communication method and related device
Publication Date: 2026.05.20 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • EP3826356B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3826356B1 patent drawingFigure 3a
  • EP3826356B1 patent drawingFigure 3b

AI summary

This application provides a communication method and a related device that are related to data transmission in vehicle-to-everything. The method includes: A terminal device obtains a first parameter value of an uplink and a second parameter value of a sidelink; and the terminal device determines, based on a comparison between the first parameter value and the second parameter value, to transmit to-be-transmitted uplink data or to-be-transmitted sidelink data. Through implementation of this method, a vehicle-mounted terminal device in the vehicle-to-everything can better satisfy uplink and sidelink transmission requirements.