V2X Task Splitting and Response Merging for Dual RAT Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current V2X communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing the selection of Radio Access Technologies (RATs) such as DSRC and LTE V2V/V2X, as existing solutions do not optimally allocate tasks based on Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and communication link feedback, leading to suboptimal performance in vehicular applications.

Innovation Solution

An application management apparatus that dynamically allocates tasks to the most suitable RAT (DSRC or LTE) based on KPI attributes and communication link feedback, using a task split and response merge apparatus to optimize task allocation and ensure seamless communication across different RATs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If DSRC contention based access is used, then simplicity of access is improved, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess simplicityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between DSRC contention-based access and LTE scheduling-based access based on real-time communication conditions and application requirements. The application management apparatus monitors channel status, traffic patterns, and performance metrics to adaptively select the optimal access method, transforming a static access mechanism into a dynamic one that optimizes both simplicity and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by adjusting which RAT (DSRC or LTE) is used for specific applications based on KPI thresholds and communication conditions. The application management apparatus modifies access parameters such as scheduling intervals, resource allocation, and handover thresholds to balance access simplicity with resource utilization efficiency across different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If LTE scheduling based access is used, then resource utilization efficiency is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the V2X communication system into two distinct access domains: DSRC contention-based access for simple scenarios and LTE scheduling-based access for efficiency-critical scenarios. The application management apparatus divides application tasks into different categories and assigns them to appropriate RATs, reducing overall system complexity by avoiding the need for a single complex access mechanism to handle all cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The application management apparatus acts as an intermediary layer between applications and the underlying RATs. It manages the complexity of dual-RAT support by providing a unified interface for application developers while handling the complex decisions of RAT selection, task allocation, and handover management, thereby shielding applications from system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If dual RAT support is implemented, then communication reliability is improved, but task allocation complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidtask allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the application management apparatus continuously monitors communication quality, channel conditions, and application performance metrics. Based on this feedback, it dynamically adjusts task allocation between DSRC and LTE, optimizing reliability while managing allocation complexity through data-driven decisions rather than static rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The application management apparatus enables self-service by allowing applications to declare their own KPI requirements and communication preferences. The system automatically matches these requirements with suitable RATs and allocates tasks accordingly, reducing the burden on developers to manually configure complex dual-RAT allocations while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If dynamic task allocation between RATs is implemented, then application performance is improved, but management complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication performanceVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The application management apparatus provides universal functionality by handling multiple tasks including RAT selection, task allocation, handover management, and performance monitoring through a single integrated mechanism. This multi-functional approach improves application performance across diverse scenarios while containing management complexity by consolidating responsibilities in one centralized component rather than distributing complexity across multiple specialized modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11601875B2Multiple radio access technology application management
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 INTEL CORP
  • US11601875B2 patent drawing
  • US11601875B2 patent drawing
  • US11601875B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An application management apparatus for controlling tasks, including a task split and response merge circuit configured to divide an application into a plurality of tasks and associate respective Key Performance Indicator (KPI) attributes to the plurality of tasks; and a task management circuit configured to allocate each of the plurality of tasks to a first or second Radio Access Technology (RAT) based on the KPI attributes, and to derive a plurality of task responses from the first or second RATs to which the respective plurality of tasks are allocated, wherein the task split and response merge circuit is further configured to merge the task responses to select the first or second RAT to run the application.