Vacuum Backfilling Hydrophobic Separator Impregnation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for filling porous, hydrophobic separator materials with polar electrolytes in high-voltage electrolytic capacitors, such as those used in implantable medical devices, are inefficient due to the hydrophobic nature of materials like fluorinated coatings, which resist wetting and require surfactants or surface modifications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving vacuum backfilling of capacitor assemblies, where the interior is evacuated and then filled with liquid electrolyte under pressure through a fill-port, allowing the electrolyte to penetrate porous, hydrophobic separators without the need for surfactants or surface energy modifications, using materials like PTFE and polypropylene as-is.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If hydrophobic separator materials (e.g., fluorinated materials) are used, then chemical inertness and structural stability are improved, but wetting by polar electrolyte deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical inertnessVSAvoidwetting by electrolyte
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state and pressure parameters of the electrolyte introduction process. By introducing electrolyte under pressure into a vacuum-evacuated capacitor assembly, the patent overcomes the hydrophobic surface energy barrier of fluorinated separator materials, enabling complete pore penetration without modifying the separator's chemical composition or surface properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If surfactants or surface energy modifications are used to improve wetting, then electrolyte penetration is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrolyte penetrationVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for surfactants and surface energy modification steps from the manufacturing process. By using pressure differential (vacuum backfilling), the method achieves complete electrolyte penetration of hydrophobic separators without any chemical additives or surface treatments, thereby simplifying the manufacturing process and reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies pneumatic principles by using vacuum evacuation and pressure differential to drive electrolyte penetration. The vacuum backfilling process uses pressure differentials to force the electrolyte through the hydrophobic separator pores, eliminating the need for surfactant-based wetting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional filling methods are used, then assembly simplicity is maintained, but electrolyte impregnation of hydrophobic separators is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidseparator impregnation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary vacuum evacuation of the capacitor assembly before electrolyte introduction. This preliminary action removes air and vapor from the separator pores, creating a vacuum that enhances subsequent electrolyte penetration when pressure is applied, ensuring complete impregnation of hydrophobic materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs pneumatic principles through vacuum backfilling, where vacuum evacuation followed by pressure-driven electrolyte introduction ensures complete pore penetration of hydrophobic separators, achieving reliable impregnation while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively impregnates hydrophobic separators with polar electrolytes, simplifying capacitor assembly, reducing costs, and enhancing the performance of capacitors used in medical devices by eliminating the need for surfactants and surface modifications, while maintaining structural integrity and preventing short-circuiting.

Implementation Method 1

using vacuum to evacuate the interior atmosphere of the capacitor assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

pressure may be applied to the reservoir of liquid electrolyte, forcing the liquid electrolyte into the evacuated capacitor assembly through the fill-port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

The fill-port can then be sealed. The present invention relates to a method of backfilling a capacitor assembly according to claim 1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentEP2386128B1Separator filled with electrolyte
Publication Date: 2018.01.10 MEDTRONIC INC
  • EP2386128B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

Methods are provided to suitably impregnate low surface energy separator materials with polar electrolyte in an electrolytic capacitor. Backfilling methods overcome the high contact angles exhibited by polar electrolytes on porous hydrophobic separators, forcing the electrolyte into the separator pores, thereby sufficiently impregnating the separator disposed between two electrodes within the capacitor assembly. Methods enable use of separators sans surfactant or surface modifications to improve wetting.