Vacuum Closure Device With Sliding Plate Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for creating a vacuum in packaging require complex bags with specialized sealing and vacuum creation mechanisms, which are not suitable for applications needing only a relative vacuum and are more expensive than necessary.

Innovation Solution

A closure device comprising three superimposed plates with through openings and fixing means, where the third plate can occupy two positions to allow or block gas circulation, compatible with standard vacuum cleaners and easily integrated into various packaging types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex sealing means and separate vacuum creation means are used, then a perfect vacuum can be achieved, but the bag structure becomes complex and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum qualityVSAvoidbag structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention combines the sealing function and vacuum creation function into a single integrated closure device. The closure device includes a closure element that seals the opening and a vacuum creation element with a valve that allows vacuum extraction through the same closure structure, eliminating the need for separate sealing and vacuum mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The closure device serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as a seal for the bag opening, provides a pathway for vacuum extraction via the valve, and can be opened to allow refilling or access. This multi-functional design simplifies the overall bag structure while maintaining effective vacuum creation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If specialized vacuum creation mechanisms are used, then a perfect vacuum is achieved, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The closure device uses simple, inexpensive components such as a basic valve mechanism integrated into the closure element. The valve can be a simple stopper or plug that is easily manufactured and replaced if needed, avoiding the need for expensive, complex vacuum systems while achieving sufficient vacuum for the application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The valve in the vacuum creation element can be designed to be manually operated by the user without requiring specialized equipment or complex mechanisms. The user simply opens the valve to allow vacuum extraction and closes it to seal the vacuum, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating the need for additional costly vacuum pumps or control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If separate opening for filling and separate valve for vacuum are used, then vacuum creation is effective, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum creation efficiencyVSAvoidclosure device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closure element and vacuum creation element are merged into a single integrated closure device. The closure element seals the bag opening while the vacuum creation element with its valve is incorporated into the same structure, allowing both filling and vacuum extraction to occur through one unified mechanism rather than requiring separate openings and valves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the creation of a relative vacuum in a simple and cost-effective manner, compatible with multiple packaging applications, enhancing storage and transport of foodstuffs while maintaining product freshness and facilitating easy stacking and storage.

Implementation Method 1

creating a relative vacuum in the interior of the packaging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP1808383B1Closing device for a packaging for storage under relative vacuum
Publication Date: 2008.03.19 DHENAIN FRANCE
  • EP1808383B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1808383B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP1808383B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

The device has a lower plate (2) with transversal openings and fixation units (6), and an intermediate plate (3) with transversal openings superimposed with the former openings when the plates are fixed together. An upper plate (4) has a circular opening (11) and is connected with lateral longitudinal slides (8) of the plate (3) so as to occupy open and close positions. The opening (11) is not superimposed on the transversal openings in the close position to provide a sealing obstacle during gas circulation across the device which is made of plastic material.