Vacuum Cleaner Filter Dedusting Using Pressure-Difference Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vacuum cleaning appliances are not very effective in automatically detecting the degree of soiling of the filter element and consequently dedusting it, leading to insufficient cleaning that hampers the suction process.

Innovation Solution

A method involving pressure sensors positioned upstream and downstream of the filter element to measure pressure differences, triggering the filter element cleaning device when predetermined thresholds are reached, ensuring efficient dedusting and potentially switching off the appliance when soiling becomes excessive.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automatic dedusting is performed based on pressure difference detection, then the filter element cleaning is automated, but the cleaning effectiveness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic dedustingVSAvoidcleaning effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control device continuously monitors the pressure difference between upstream and downstream pressure sensors and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the dedusting process. When the pressure difference indicates significant dirt accumulation, the control device triggers the dedusting device to clean the filter element, creating a closed-loop feedback system that ensures cleaning is performed at the optimal moment for maximum effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of the filter element's soiling state through pressure difference measurement before dedusting is actually needed. By continuously monitoring the pressure difference and comparing it against threshold values, the system prepares for dedusting in advance, triggering the cleaning process before the filter becomes completely blocked, thereby maintaining both automation and effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If continuous monitoring of pressure difference is implemented, then the suction process efficiency is maintained, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuction process efficiencyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vacuum cleaning appliance monitors its own filter element condition through integrated pressure sensors and control logic. The system uses the existing suction airflow to generate the pressure difference signal, eliminating the need for external monitoring equipment. The control device automatically processes the pressure readings and triggers dedusting without external intervention, allowing the system to self-monitor and self-maintain suction efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure sensors and control logic are integrated into the existing vacuum cleaning appliance structure, merging the monitoring function with the suction and dedusting systems. Rather than adding separate independent monitoring equipment, the pressure difference measurement is incorporated into the airflow path already present in the vacuum cleaner, combining multiple functions into a unified system that maintains productivity without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method ensures efficient dedusting of the filter element, maintaining effective suction by continuously monitoring pressure differences and adjusting the cleaning process, ultimately extending the operational life of the vacuum cleaning appliance.

Implementation Method 1

determining a pressure difference which can give information about the degree of soiling of the filter element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference measurement: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS11564543B2Efficient filter cleaning
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 HILTI AG
  • US11564543B2 patent drawing
  • US11564543B2 patent drawing
  • US11564543B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a vacuum cleaning appliance, having a filter element, a filter element cleaning device, a control device, a turbine, a first pressure sensor and a second pressure sensor. The method includes operating the vacuum cleaning appliance to suck in the air stream through the filter element; determining a first pressure reference value; measuring the pressure difference between the first and second pressure values; dedusting the filter element with the aid of the filter element cleaning device if the value of the pressure difference between the first and second pressure values reaches a first threshold value; determining a second pressure reference value after the end of the dedusting of the filter element; determining a difference value between the second and first pressure reference values; and dedusting the filter element if the difference value between the second and first pressure reference values reaches a second threshold value, or switching off the vacuum cleaning appliance if the difference value between the second and first pressure reference values reaches a third threshold value. A vacuum cleaning appliance for carrying out the method.