Individually Controllable Vacuum Holes for Large Format Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large ink jet printer systems face inefficiencies due to non-adjustable vacuum zones, leading to vacuum pressure loss, inkjet de-priming, and increased setup times when handling materials of varying sizes, resulting in wasted time and resources.

Innovation Solution

A vacuum table system with individually controllable vacuum holes using a valve mechanism, allowing selective opening and closing of vacuum holes based on magnetic or mechanical control, enabling flexible vacuum application to any substrate size without manual masking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vacuum holes are left unrestricted outside the print material area, then vacuum pressure is maintained across the entire table, but vacuum pressure is lost and inkjet de-priming occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum pressure maintenanceVSAvoidvacuum pressure loss and inkjet de-priming
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The vacuum table is divided into multiple independently controllable zones with individual vacuum holes that can be selectively activated or deactivated. Each vacuum hole or group of holes can be controlled separately through a control system, allowing the active vacuum area to precisely match the print material boundaries, thus preventing vacuum pressure loss and inkjet de-priming while maintaining reliable vacuum where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vacuum hole activation state is dynamically adjusted based on the print material size and position. The control system enables real-time switching of vacuum hole states (active/inactive) according to the specific print job requirements, allowing the system to adapt to different material sizes and prevent harmful effects while maintaining effective vacuum coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If manual masking is used to cover active vacuum holes, then vacuum pressure is preserved, but setup time and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum pressure preservationVSAvoidsetup time and labor time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical masking process is replaced with an automated electronic control system that selectively activates or deactivates individual vacuum holes through electrical or magnetic control mechanisms. This substitution eliminates the need for manual masking operations, reducing setup time and labor costs while effectively preserving vacuum pressure in the required areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically determines which vacuum holes should be active based on print material dimensions and position, and autonomously adjusts their states without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by intelligently managing vacuum hole activation, eliminating the need for operator masking actions and reducing setup time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If zone controls are used with pre-determined sheet sizes, then vacuum coverage is optimized for specific patterns, but flexibility for varying material sizes is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum coverage optimizationVSAvoidflexibility for varying material sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Each vacuum hole or zone is assigned independent controllable properties, allowing different regions of the vacuum table to have different activation states tailored to the specific print material. This local control enables optimal vacuum coverage for each material size and position, while providing full flexibility to adapt to varying material dimensions without being constrained by pre-determined zone patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control system provides universal functionality by being able to accommodate any material size or shape through selective activation of individual vacuum holes. The system can be configured for different print scenarios (different material sizes, positions, and shapes) using the same hardware infrastructure, making it universally adaptable to various printing requirements without needing physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces consumable costs and downtime by allowing precise control of vacuum pressure over any substrate shape, preventing inkjet de-priming and optimizing printer setup times.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum hole through which a vacuum is drawn, an outlet connected to a vacuum source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

a restrictor, which in some aspects is magnetic, is movable within the slot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS10960688B2Printer vacuum control system
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 NOVUS PRINTING EQUIP LLC
  • US10960688B2 patent drawing
  • US10960688B2 patent drawing
  • US10960688B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printer having a vacuum system to hold down material being printed is provided. The vacuum system includes a number of vacuum holes in the printer table. Each one of these vacuum holes is individually controllable such that variously sized materials may used on the printer table and vacuum may be applied only underneath the particular material being printed on.