Vacuum Impregnation Tank Segmentation for Foam Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vacuum impregnation systems face challenges with thick polymer solutions, including foaming issues in dry vacuum processes and reduced sealing performance due to hydraulic head pressure in wet vacuum processes, which complicates the sealing of pores and gaps in parts.

Innovation Solution

A dry vacuum impregnation system with a tank-inside-a-tank structure, where the impregnating polymer is contained in an open-top inner tank within a pressure-resistant outer tank, reduces foaming and allows for deeper, smaller-diameter tanks without compromising seal quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wet vacuum process is used with thick polymer solutions, then sealing performance is reduced due to hydraulic head pressure, but dry vacuum process causes severe foaming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidfoaming
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the vacuum chamber into two separate compartments: an upper chamber for applying vacuum to parts and a lower reservoir for holding the polymer solution. This segmentation prevents the polymer solution from being directly exposed to vacuum, eliminating foaming while maintaining effective sealing through capillary action and pressure differentials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism where the polymer solution remains in the lower reservoir and is selectively drawn into the upper chamber through controlled pressure differentials and capillary action. This intermediary arrangement allows the system to benefit from both dry vacuum (no foaming) and wet vacuum (good sealing) conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If thick polymer solutions with higher viscosity are used, then sealing performance improves, but foaming increases in dry vacuum processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidfoaming
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the polymer solution reservoir from the vacuum chamber, the system allows use of high-viscosity thick polymer solutions in the lower chamber without exposing them to vacuum. This enables improved sealing performance through better polymer penetration while completely avoiding the foaming problem that would occur if these viscous solutions were directly subjected to vacuum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If shallow tanks are used to reduce liquid head pressure, then sealing performance improves, but tank quantity required increases for commercial production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidtank quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a single deep tank design with segmented chambers: a lower reservoir chamber for polymer solution and an upper processing chamber for parts. This eliminates the need for multiple shallow tanks while maintaining effective sealing, as the polymer solution is not directly exposed to vacuum and thus no excessive head pressure is generated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If deep tanks are used, then fewer tanks are needed for commercial production, but hydraulic head pressure reduces sealing performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoidsealing performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a deep single-tank design with segmented chambers that allows use of fewer tanks for commercial production. The lower reservoir chamber holds the polymer solution away from vacuum, while the upper chamber processes parts. This segmentation maintains effective sealing performance despite the increased tank depth and production capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces foaming and allows for improved sealing performance by minimizing the impact of hydraulic head pressure, enabling the use of thicker polymer solutions without the need for cross-linking, and facilitating easier cleaning and operation.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the article to a vacuum, contacting the article with an impregnation liquid, then optionally applying a positive pressure to help move the impregnation liquid into the pores and gaps

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

applying a positive pressure to help move the impregnation liquid into the pores and gaps

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

where the impregnating liquid solidifies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS12330184B2Systems and methods for vacuum impregnation
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 HENKEL KGAA
  • US12330184B2 patent drawing
  • US12330184B2 patent drawing
  • US12330184B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vacuum impregnation system and processes that subject a part to a vacuum, immerse the part in a polymer impregnating liquid, and apply positive pressure to the part to introduce the polymer impregnating liquid into part porosities, releasing the pressure to atmospheric pressure and solidifying the polymer impregnating liquid, preferably without an active polymerization step.