Vacuum Laser Welding with Rotating Goggles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laser welding methods for metal workpieces face challenges in achieving high-quality welds with short non-productive times, as they often require complex vacuum setups and are prone to contamination and oxidation, especially when using electron beam welding which is expensive and sensitive to air ingress.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for vacuum laser welding where the workpiece, workpiece carrier, and welding goggles are moved relative to each other to create a sealed chamber, allowing for rapid evacuation and rotation during laser processing, minimizing space and reducing contamination by using a compact welding chamber design with rotating welding goggles and controlled gas flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a large vacuum chamber is used for electron beam welding, then welding precision is improved, but evacuation time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding precisionVSAvoidevacuation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The welding chamber is segmented into a compact configuration where the workpiece carrier, welding goggles, and housing work together to create a sealed volume only around the welding area. This segmentation allows the vacuum chamber to be much smaller than traditional electron beam welding chambers while maintaining welding precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The welding goggles are extracted as a separate, movable component that can be positioned close to the workpiece to define the vacuum chamber boundaries. This extraction allows the vacuum chamber to be formed dynamically around the welding area rather than requiring a large fixed chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If electron beam welding is used, then welding precision is improved, but device cost and fragility increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding precisionVSAvoiddevice cost and fragility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the expensive and fragile electron gun with a more robust and inexpensive laser beam source. The laser can tolerate air ingress better and is less costly, while the compact vacuum chamber design maintains welding quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical electron beam generation system is replaced with an optical laser system. The laser beam achieves similar welding precision without requiring the complex electron gun assembly, vacuum seals, and associated mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Volume of stationary object

If the workpiece is moved close to the welding goggles to seal the chamber, then chamber volume is reduced, but sealing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechamber volumeVSAvoidsealing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing requirement is applied locally at the interface between the workpiece carrier and welding goggles rather than requiring a complete seal around the entire chamber. The first and second seals are positioned specifically where the workpiece carrier contacts the welding goggles, simplifying the sealing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The welding goggles are made rotatable on the workpiece carrier, allowing dynamic adjustment of the sealing interface. This rotational capability maintains seal integrity while accommodating positioning variations and enabling the workpiece to define the chamber boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If the welding goggles are fixed, then sealing is simpler, but rotation during welding becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing simplicityVSAvoidrotation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The welding goggles are made rotatable on the workpiece carrier through a bearing connection, allowing the workpiece and welding goggles to rotate together during laser processing. This dynamic design maintains simple sealing at the fixed interface while enabling necessary rotation for welding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high-quality laser welding with reduced non-productive times, minimal metal spatters, and limited oxidation, while being cost-effective and robust, as it uses a laser beam for precise and controlled welds within a compact vacuum environment.

Implementation Method 1

an annular connection area between at least two workpiece parts of the workpiece, which is exposed to the vacuum in the welding chamber, is welded by a laser beam, with the laser beam propagating through the welding chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser beam: Laser

Implementation Method 2

the welding chamber is evacuated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentEP3280561B1Method of vaccum laser welding of an at least two-pieces workpiece
Publication Date: 2019.05.01 FELSOMAT GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3280561B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3280561B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP3280561B1 patent drawingFigure 1c

AI summary

The invention comprises a method for the vacuum laser welding of an at least two-part workpiece (2), with the following steps: a) the workpiece (2) or a workpiece carrier (25), on which the workpiece (2) is arranged, and a set of welding goggles (3) are moved relatively towards one another and pressed against one another, so that a welding chamber (11) is enclosed and sealed in a gas-tight manner by the workpiece (2) and/or the workpiece carrier (25), the welding goggles (3) and a welding goggles holder (4), in which the welding goggles (3) are rotatably mounted; b) the welding chamber (11) is evacuated; c) an annular connecting region (18) between at least two workpiece parts (2a, 2b) of the workpiece (2) that is exposed to the vacuum in the welding chamber (11) is welded by a laser beam (49), wherein the laser beam (49) propagates through the welding chamber (11), and wherein the workpiece (2) or the workpiece carrier (25) together with the workpiece (2) and the welding goggles (3) are turned in relation to the welding goggles holder (4); d) air is admitted to the welding chamber; e) the workpiece (2) or the workpiece carrier (25) on which the workpiece (2) is arranged and the welding goggles (3) are moved relatively away from one another. The invention provides a method for the laser machining of at least two-part workpieces with which laser machining of a high quality can be performed with short downtimes.