Vacuum Cleaner Nozzle with Rotatable Base for Multi-Surface Cleaning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vacuum cleaner nozzles lack an efficient mechanism to switch between different cleaning conditions for various surfaces without requiring complex valve mechanisms or increased force, leading to potential debris deposition and reduced suction efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A nozzle design with a rotatable base that has distinct cleaning sides for hard and soft surfaces, allowing air and debris to be sucked through alternate outlets without a valve mechanism, enabling easy switching between cleaning conditions and minimizing wear on the nozzle components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a valve mechanism is used to block the suction outlet not in use, then cleaning efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficiencyVSAvoidvalve mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the valve mechanism from the system entirely. Instead of using a valve to block the unused suction outlet, the design allows both outlets to remain open while using airflow control to direct suction through the intended path. This eliminates the complexity of valve mechanisms while maintaining cleaning efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces airflow as an intermediary to control the suction path. By manipulating air flow dynamics rather than using mechanical valves, the system achieves efficient cleaning without the complexity of valve mechanisms. The airflow itself acts as the mediator that directs debris through the appropriate outlet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a valve mechanism is used to switch between cleaning conditions, then adaptability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to increased force requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching between cleaning conditionsVSAvoidforce required to operate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the valve mechanism that required significant force to operate. By allowing both suction outlets to remain open and using airflow control instead of mechanical blocking, the system achieves adaptability between different cleaning conditions without requiring the user to apply excessive force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the vacuum cleaner's own airflow to control the suction path automatically. The airflow dynamics self-regulate which outlet is used based on the cleaning conditions, eliminating the need for manual valve operation and reducing the force required by the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If the base is fixed in one position, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different surfaces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase structure simplicityVSAvoidcleaning different surface types
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention makes the base rotatable relative to the body, transforming it from a fixed to a dynamic component. This allows the user to rotate the base to present different cleaning surfaces (e.g., hard floor or carpet side) to different surface types, providing adaptability while maintaining relatively simple device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The base is designed with multiple cleaning surfaces that can be rotated into position depending on the surface type being cleaned. This multi-functional design allows a single base structure to handle both hard floors and carpets, increasing adaptability without requiring multiple separate bases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If debris accumulates on the unused cleaning side, then device complexity is reduced, but harmful factors increase due to potential debris deposition on the surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris removal mechanismVSAvoiddebris deposition on surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies suction to the unused cleaning side before it is needed, removing any accumulated debris in advance. This preliminary cleaning action prevents debris from being deposited on the surface when the base is rotated, eliminating the harmful effect without requiring a complex debris removal mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the potentially harmful accumulated debris into a benefit by using the suction system to actively remove it. The same suction mechanism that cleans the surface also cleans the unused side of the base, turning what would be a harmful accumulation into a useful cleaning opportunity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The nozzle effectively cleans both hard and soft surfaces with reduced force and wear, maintaining suction efficiency and hygiene by allowing debris accumulation on unused sides to be removed, and preventing debris from being deposited on the surface.

Implementation Method 1

a suction chamber and the base encloses one side of the suction chamber when the base is in one of the cleaning conditions. The at least one cleaning side that is not acting on the surface may be subjected to suction in the suction chamber so that any debris that has accumulated on the one of that cleaning side may be removed by the suction.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentEP3030127B1A nozzle for a vacuum cleaner
Publication Date: 2017.02.01 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP3030127B1 patent drawing
  • EP3030127B1 patent drawing
  • EP3030127B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application relates to a nozzle for a vacuum cleaner. The nozzle comprises a body (2) and a base (3). The base (3) has a longitudinal axis, and at least two cleaning sides (17, 18) configured to act on a surface in respective cleaning conditions. The base (3) is rotatable around a rotational axis (A-A) that is parallel to the longitudinal axis of the base to move the base (3) between the respective cleaning conditions.