Vacuum Residue Refining via Selective Deasphalting and Catalytic Cracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processes for refining heavy hydrocarbon vacuum residue feedstocks with high sulfur, asphaltene, and metals content are inefficient, leading to suboptimal production of gasoline and light olefins, as they require preliminary conversion stages that result in poor quality products and operational challenges.

Innovation Solution

A process involving selective deasphalting followed by hydrotreatment and catalytic cracking, where a mixture of polar and apolar solvents is used for deasphalting under subcritical conditions to produce high-quality deasphalted oil, which is then treated in a fixed-bed reactor and further processed in a fluidized-bed reactor to maximize gasoline and light olefin production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional conversion units (visbreaking, coking, hydroconversion) are used to treat vacuum residue, then the feedstock can be processed, but the selectivity is directed towards diesel fuel cuts and the yields of gasoline and light olefins are disadvantaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of gasoline and light olefinsVSAvoidselectivity towards diesel fuel cuts
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the operating parameters and process conditions by using a fluidized-bed catalytic cracking unit with specific catalysts and conditions optimized for producing gasoline and light olefins, rather than the conventional diesel-oriented conversion units. This parameter change enables high-value product production from high-metals vacuum residue

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and removes metals and sulfur from the vacuum residue feedstock through a desulfurization unit before the catalytic cracking stage. This preliminary extraction of harmful components enables the subsequent cracking unit to operate with high selectivity towards gasoline and light olefins without being poisoned by metals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If vacuum residue with high metals content (>70 ppm, even >200 ppm) is sent directly to RDS+RFCC scheme, then the process cannot be operated, but preliminary conversion stages are required which create operational difficulties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperability of RDS+RFCC schemeVSAvoidnumber of preliminary conversion stages
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary desulfurization and metal removal in a dedicated unit before the RDS+RFCC scheme. This preliminary action of removing harmful components enables the main process to operate reliably without requiring multiple complex conversion stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary desulfurization unit between the vacuum residue feedstock and the RDS+RFCC scheme. This intermediary unit acts as a mediator that prepares the feedstock by removing metals and sulfur, making it suitable for the subsequent process without requiring direct feeding of high-metals residue

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If conversion units are used for vacuum residue, then processing is achieved, but the properties of light cuts are of poor quality and definitely require post-treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidquality of light cuts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the process parameters and sequence by performing desulfurization and metal removal before catalytic cracking, rather than after. This parameter change in process sequence and conditions produces light cuts with inherently better quality that require minimal or no post-treatment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If conventional deasphalting is used, then asphalt is removed, but the yield of deasphalted oil is not maximized and quality may not be sufficient for RDS+RFCC unit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of deasphalted oilVSAvoidquality of deasphalted oil
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the deasphalting parameters by using specific solvent ratios, temperatures, and pressures optimized to maximize both the yield and quality of deasphalted oil. These parameter changes ensure the DAO is suitable for subsequent RDS+RFCC processing while achieving high yield

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the yield and quality of gasoline and light olefins, reduces metal and sulfur content, and optimizes the utilization of subsequent refining units, thereby improving overall production efficiency and product quality.

Implementation Method 1

a stage of selective deasphalting of the feedstock by a single-stage liquid/liquid extraction in an extractant, said extraction being carried out by means of a mixture of at least one polar solvent and at least one apolar solvent, said deasphalting stage being carried out under the subcritical conditions for the mixture of solvents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Implementation Method 2

a stage of hydrotreatment of at least a part of the deasphalted oil (DAO) phase originating from stage a) in the presence of hydrogen in at least one fixed-bed reactor containing at least one hydrodemetallization catalyst under conditions allowing an effluent to be obtained with a reduced content of metals and Conradson carbon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodemetallization: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

a stage of hydrotreatment of at least a part of the deasphalted oil (DAO) phase originating from stage a) in the presence of hydrogen in at least one fixed-bed reactor containing at least one hydrodemetallization catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodesulfurization: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 4

a stage of catalytic cracking of at least a part of the effluent from stage b) in at least one fluidized-bed reactor under conditions allowing a gasoline fraction and/or a light olefins fraction to be produced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic cracking: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS9926499B2Process for refining a hydrocarbon feedstock of the vacuum residue type using selective deasphalting, a hydrotreatment and a conversion of the vacuum residue for production of gasoline and light olefins
Publication Date: 2018.03.27 IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for refining a heavy feedstock of the vacuum residue type. Selective deasphalting of the feedstock is conducted in a single-stage liquid/liquid extraction in an extractant. Extraction is carried out by means of a mixture of at least one polar solvent and at least one apolar solvent, to obtain an asphalt phase and a deasphalted oil (DAO) phase. The proportions of polar solvent and apolar solvent in the solvent mixture are adjusted according to properties of the feedstock, desired yield of asphalt and/or desired quality of the DAO. Deasphalting is implemented under subcritical conditions. At least a part of the DAO is subjected to hydrotreatment. At least a part of the effluent originating from the hydrotreatment is subjected to catalytic cracking in at least one fluidized-bed reactor under conditions allowing a gasoline fraction and/or a light olefins fraction to be produced.