Vacuum Responsive Panels with Axial Offset Margins

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hot-filled thermoplastic containers, such as PET bottles, experience unwanted deformation due to thermal contraction, which affects their appearance and structural integrity, particularly at the label area, and existing solutions like collapse panels and reinforcement ribs do not fully address the issue of uncontrolled sidewall deformation.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates vacuum responsive panels with axially offset weak points that focus initial deflection, preventing random panel movement and enhancing compressive resistance by transforming from a convex to a substantially planar shape under pressure differential, thereby minimizing sidewall deformation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If wall thickness of the container is increased to strengthen container walls, then resistance to vacuum deformation is improved, but raw material consumption increases and production speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to vacuum deformationVSAvoidraw material consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The container wall is segmented into multiple functional zones: rigid lands providing structural support, flexible vacuum panels allowing controlled deformation, and reinforcement ribs strategically positioned to prevent uncontrolled buckling. This segmentation allows thin walls to resist vacuum deformation through distributed structural support rather than uniform thickness increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the container wall have different thicknesses and mechanical properties. The lands and reinforcement ribs have greater thickness and stiffness, while the vacuum panels have reduced thickness for flexibility. This local differentiation optimizes material distribution, providing strength where needed and flexibility where required, thereby reducing overall material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If wall thickness of the container is increased to strengthen container walls, then resistance to vacuum deformation is improved, but production speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to vacuum deformationVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The blow-molding process is segmented into multiple stages with different pressures and temperatures optimized for each zone. The lands and reinforcement ribs are formed first with higher pressure, followed by the vacuum panels with lower pressure. This segmented forming process reduces overall cycle time compared to forming a uniformly thick wall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The molding parameters (pressure, temperature, time) are changed dynamically during the forming process. Higher pressure and temperature are applied to the lands and ribs for rapid formation, while lower pressure is used for the vacuum panels. These parameter optimizations reduce the total molding cycle time, increasing production speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Shape

If collapse panels are spaced around the perimeter with intervening lands, then controlled deformation is achieved, but uncontrolled deformation occurs in the lands under high vacuum

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrolled deformationVSAvoidstructural integrity under high vacuum
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The lands are locally reinforced with strategically positioned ribs that increase their stiffness and resistance to uncontrolled buckling. The reinforcement ribs are positioned at critical locations where the lands are most susceptible to vacuum-induced deformation, providing localized structural support without preventing the vacuum panels from deforming controllably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The container wall functions as a composite structure with different mechanical properties in different zones. The lands and reinforcement ribs provide rigid structural support, while the vacuum panels provide flexible deformation capability. This composite arrangement maintains structural integrity under high vacuum while allowing controlled deformation in the designated panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If reinforcement ribs are added to collapse panels and intervening lands, then resistance to vacuum deformation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to vacuum deformationVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Reinforcement ribs are positioned only at critical locations where the lands are most susceptible to uncontrolled buckling, rather than uniformly distributing ribs throughout the entire container. This selective placement provides necessary structural support while minimizing the number of ribs and overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement structure is segmented into discrete ribs positioned at specific locations, rather than using a continuous complex framework. This segmented approach provides effective structural support through simple, easily manufactured rib elements that can be integrated into the blow-molding process without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively reduces unwanted sidewall deformation by focusing initial deflection at specific weak points, maintaining structural integrity and appearance, even under maximum pressure differential, without increasing material usage or production costs.

Implementation Method 1

under pressure differential

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

subsequent thermal contraction of the liquid upon cooling results in partial evacuation of the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentUS7861876B2Bottle with intruding margin vacuum responsive panels
Publication Date: 2011.01.04 BALL CORP
  • US7861876B2 patent drawing
  • US7861876B2 patent drawing
  • US7861876B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A container exhibiting superior resistance to unwanted or uncontrolled sidewall deformation has plurality of vacuum responsive panels, generally uniformly spaced around the sidewall periphery, including a panel surface portion radially inset from the sidewall. A post or land is provided between each nearest neighbor pair of vacuum panels, the posts having upper and lower ends joined together upper and lower sidewall edge portions. A margin is located at least at the upper and lower edges of each vacuum panel and extending between the panel surface and the sidewall. At least one of the upper and lower margins of each vacuum responsive panel includes an axially offset portion, which in response to decreasing pressure focuses any initial deflection of the panel surface to that portion of the panel contiguous to the axial offset portion.