Vacuum Valve Feedback Control for Synchronized Process Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vacuum processing systems face challenges in efficiently and reliably controlling pressure and gas flow in semiconductor production, leading to delays and reduced production quality due to decentralized coordination and lack of real-time feedback.

Innovation Solution

A centralized control and regulation unit that synchronizes the vacuum valve with other processing components, such as gas inlet valves and plasma generators, to optimize pressure regulation and gas flow, using feedback loops to adjust processes in real-time and adapt to deviations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If decentralized coordination is used for controlling vacuum valves and processing components, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to delays and lack of synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidprocessing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple decentralized control functions into a single centralized control unit that coordinates vacuum valves, gas inlet valves, and plasma generators. This merging of control functions eliminates delays caused by decentralized coordination while maintaining manageable system complexity through integrated control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit implements feedback loops that continuously monitor pressure, gas flow, and plasma generation status, then automatically adjust valve positions and process parameters. This real-time feedback synchronization improves productivity by eliminating waiting delays and ensuring coordinated operation of all processing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If real-time feedback control is implemented for pressure regulation, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control loops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs multiple functions including pressure regulation, gas flow control, plasma generation coordination, and process timing synchronization. By consolidating these diverse control functions into a single multi-functional unit, the patent achieves high manufacturing precision without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Pressure sensors provide real-time feedback to the control unit, which automatically adjusts vacuum valve positions to maintain target pressure. This closed-loop feedback control achieves precise pressure regulation while the integrated control unit manages the complexity of multiple control loops through unified control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If centralized control synchronizes all processing components, then productivity increases through reduced delays, but device complexity increases due to coordination requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit pre-coordinates valve opening/closing sequences and plasma generation timing before processing steps begin. By planning and synchronizing all component actions in advance, the system achieves high productivity through eliminated delays while managing complexity through structured sequencing logic rather than continuous complex coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple regulation loops are used for precise process control, then manufacturing precision improves, but ease of operation decreases due to complex control parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess parameter accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit automatically adjusts vacuum valve positions, gas flow rates, and plasma generation parameters based on real-time sensor feedback without requiring manual intervention. The system self-regulates multiple process parameters simultaneously, achieving high manufacturing precision while maintaining ease of operation through automated control rather than manual parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11739847B2Advanced vacuum process control
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 VAT HOLDING AG
  • US11739847B2 patent drawing
  • US11739847B2 patent drawing
  • US11739847B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a vacuum process system for an evacuable vacuum process volume, a vacuum valve, a peripheral unit having a closed-loop and open-loop control unit. The vacuum valve includes a valve seat, with a valve opening and a first sealing surface; a valve closure, with a second sealing surface and a drive unit coupled to the valve closure. The valve closure can be varied to provide different valve opening states. The closed-loop and open-loop control unit can perform multiple execution of a process cycle with control of the peripheral unit at least in part to execute a control cycle providing a deliberate variation or setting of the valve opening state by controlling the drive unit on the basis of a currently determined controlled variable for a process parameter and on the basis of a target variable and can be performed with a certain temporal relation.