Validation Server for Spoofed Communication Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Communication networks face issues with message spoofing, where attackers falsify source addresses to disguise their identity, leading to fraud and billing discrepancies, compromising the integrity of messaging services and billing processes.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to determine the authenticity of the source identifier by extracting it from incoming messages, obtaining destination identifiers from previous communications associated with the source, and comparing them with the recipient's identifier, using a validation server to authenticate the sender through communication logs and timestamps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If message spoofing is allowed to maintain ease of operation and legitimate uses, then message sending flexibility is improved, but security and reliability deteriorate due to fraud and identity disguise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage sending flexibilityVSAvoidsender identity verification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification by checking communication history between the alleged sender and recipient before delivering the message. The validation server queries whether the sender has previously communicated with the recipient, and only allows messages through if this preliminary check confirms a legitimate relationship exists between the parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A validation server acts as an intermediary between the messaging system and the user. This intermediary component receives incoming messages, performs authentication checks by querying communication history, and determines whether to allow or block the message based on the verification results, thereby resolving the conflict between allowing flexible messaging and preventing spoofing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If intelligent routing function is added to verify sender authenticity from HLR, then message security is improved, but device complexity and infrastructure requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesender authenticationVSAvoidnetwork infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation server performs multiple functions: it validates sender authenticity, checks communication history, and makes routing decisions. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional component, the system achieves reliable sender verification without proportionally increasing infrastructure complexity, as the same server handles various validation tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses existing communication history data that is already maintained by the messaging infrastructure for billing and routing purposes. Instead of requiring entirely new verification infrastructure, the system repurposes existing data stores and communication channels to perform authentication, thereby reducing the need for additional complex infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If source identifier extraction and verification are performed for every incoming message, then spoofing detection accuracy is improved, but processing time and system load worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespoofing detection accuracyVSAvoidmessage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial verification by checking only essential elements (whether the sender has previously communicated with the recipient) rather than conducting exhaustive analysis of all message attributes. This partial action approach maintains adequate spoofing detection accuracy while minimizing additional processing time and system load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9356953B2System and method to prevent spoofed communication through out-of-band verification
Publication Date: 2016.05.31 VONAGE AMERICA LLC
  • US9356953B2 patent drawing
  • US9356953B2 patent drawing
  • US9356953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed subject matter addresses the problem of spoofing by directly and transparently communicating with the apparent sender of the potentially spoofed incoming message or with the communications network handing the communication of the potentially spoofed incoming message. The address of the recipient device of the potentially spoofed incoming message is compared with addresses of communication sent from the apparent sender. As a result of this comparison, it may be determined whether the phone call or message was sent from the apparent source or was spoofed. The times associated with messages sent from the indicated sender and times associated with the incoming message may also be used to determine the authenticity of the apparent sender. The recipient is of the incoming message is notified of a spoofed message.