Value Targeting Tools for Strategic Budget Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional planning and budgeting processes in business organizations are time-consuming, costly, and fail to add significant value, often leading to political behavior and game playing, while being disconnected from strategic goals and shareholder value creation.

Innovation Solution

An integrated approach that aligns organizational targets with key strategies to maximize shareholder value, using Value Targeting (VT) tools and software applications for strategic planning, evaluation, and budgeting, which includes identifying key value drivers, building critical capabilities, and aligning management processes and compensation around execution of strategy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional planning and budgeting processes are used, then comprehensive budget coverage is achieved, but the process becomes time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebudget coverageVSAvoidbudgeting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary strategic planning and target setting before the budgeting process. By pre-defining strategic goals, value drivers, and performance targets, the organization eliminates the need for extensive iterative budget negotiations, significantly reducing budgeting time while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The budgeting process is segmented into distinct phases: strategic planning, target setting, and budget preparation. This segmentation allows each phase to be handled independently with appropriate tools and methodologies, reducing overall process time while ensuring thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If traditional top-down budgeting is used, then budget control is strengthened, but strategic focus is lost and departmental barriers are reinforced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebudget controlVSAvoidstrategic alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system inverts the traditional top-down budgeting approach by starting with strategic goals and value drivers, then cascading targets down to operational levels. This inversion ensures strategic focus is maintained while enabling bottom-up budget preparation that aligns with organizational objectives, breaking down departmental barriers through shared strategic priorities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Manufacturing precision

If detailed budgeting is performed, then operational limits are defined, but responsiveness and flexibility are constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebudget precisionVSAvoidorganizational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic target management where performance targets and value drivers can be adjusted in response to changing conditions. Rather than rigid budget constraints, the organization uses flexible performance metrics that adapt to market changes, maintaining precision in goal-setting while preserving organizational flexibility and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Quantity of substance

If traditional cost accounting is used, then cost tracking is achieved, but value creation insight is lost and political behavior is encouraged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost trackingVSAvoidvalue creation information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the fundamental parameters from cost accounting to value-based management. Instead of tracking costs alone, it incorporates value drivers, performance metrics, and strategic alignment measures. This parameter transformation provides comprehensive cost tracking while simultaneously delivering insights into value creation, eliminating the need for political budget negotiations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7930195B2Strategic management and budgeting tools
Publication Date: 2011.04.19 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD
  • US7930195B2 patent drawing
  • US7930195B2 patent drawing
  • US7930195B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A target setting, forecasting, and budgeting method and tools are provided in which targets are selected at a high level of management through a process of strategic planning to select targets based on a combination of value expected to be added and manageability of the candidate targets, including computer simulations of increased cash flow expected to be generated by the target strategies. The strategically planned targets are then flowed down to the various levels of management, budgets are constructed around those target strategies, and the budgets are then consolidated and flowed upward. By defining organizational targets and then aligning those targets with strategic goals from the beginning, the number and scope of iterations of budget adjustments can be reduced.