Downhole Valve Actuation Using Impulse Vibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flow control valves in subterranean wells face increasing static force requirements due to deposition of solids over time, leading to operational challenges, and conventional solutions often result in oversized, expensive, and complex actuators.

Innovation Solution

The use of impulse and vibration stimuli applied concurrently with the actuation force by an impulse/vibration generator to overcome resistance caused by deposits, allowing for efficient operation without oversizing the actuator.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the actuator is oversized to produce enough force to overcome increasing opposing force from deposits, then the valve can operate throughout its lifetime, but the valve becomes undesirably large, expensive and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve operability throughout lifetimeVSAvoidactuator size and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies vibration stimulus to the valve assembly during actuation to reduce the static force required to move deposits and operate the valve. The vibration generator creates oscillatory motion that helps overcome the friction and adhesion forces created by scale deposits, allowing a smaller actuator to achieve the same operational effect that would otherwise require an oversized actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic impulse or vibration stimuli applied during the actuation process to intermittently reduce the resistance from deposits. This periodic action allows the actuator to overcome deposit buildup in stages rather than requiring continuous excessive force, enabling the use of a more compact actuator design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If the actuator is oversized to overcome deposit resistance, then the valve can be operated, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve operabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By incorporating a vibration generator that applies oscillatory stimulus during actuation, the system reduces the force requirements on the actuator. This allows the use of a smaller, less expensive actuator while maintaining the ability to overcome deposit resistance throughout the valve's operational life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the actuation process by superimposing vibration or impulse stimuli on the actuator output. This parameter modification reduces the effective static force requirement, allowing a more cost-effective actuator size to achieve the same reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the actuator is oversized to overcome deposit resistance, then the valve can be operated, but the device becomes unnecessarily large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve operabilityVSAvoidactuator size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration generator applies oscillatory motion to the valve assembly during actuation, reducing the static friction and adhesion forces from deposits. This allows a smaller, lighter actuator to achieve the same operational capability that would otherwise require a larger, heavier actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The vibration stimulus acts as a counteracting force that offsets the harmful static friction and adhesion forces created by deposits. By introducing this opposing vibrational force, the system reduces the net force requirement on the actuator, enabling a more compact design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the operational efficiency of flow control valves by reducing the need for oversized actuators, maintaining valve functionality despite deposit buildup, and preventing unnecessary complexity and expense.

Implementation Method 1

applying at least one of an impulse stimulus and a vibration stimulus to the tool during the actuating to enhance operation of the tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

applying at least one of an impulse stimulus and a vibration stimulus to the tool during the actuating to enhance operation of the tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpulse: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS7963324B2Flow control actuation
Publication Date: 2011.06.21 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US7963324B2 patent drawing
  • US7963324B2 patent drawing
  • US7963324B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method usable with a subterranean well that includes actuating a downhole tool (a valve assembly, for example). The method also includes applying at least one of an impulse stimulus and a vibration stimulus to the tool during the actuating to enhance operation of the tool.