Pressure Vessel Valve Block Isolation for Gas Safety Valve Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydraulic safety systems require time-consuming and resource-intensive decommissioning processes when gas safety valves are removed for maintenance, leading to significant gas losses and system depressurization, which is inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

A security system with at least two gas safety valves connected to a valve block, where a controllable valve ensures a permanent gas-carrying connection between the pressure accumulator and another gas safety valve, allowing for safe removal and maintenance without depressurizing the hydraulic system, using mechanical, electrical, or chip-controlled actuation concepts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of repair

If a gas safety valve is removed from the valve block for maintenance, then the valve can be serviced or replaced, but the hydraulic system must be depressurized and gas is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance of gas safety valveVSAvoidgas loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the gas safety function into multiple independent valves (at least two gas safety valves) that can be serviced separately. Each valve has its own controllable valve for isolation, allowing one valve to be maintained while the other remains operational and retains pressure in the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational state parameters by introducing controllable valves that can switch between open and closed positions. This allows the system to maintain pressure (different parameter state) during maintenance by isolating the specific valve being serviced from the pressure source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of repair

If a gas safety valve is removed for maintenance, then the valve can be serviced, but time-consuming decommissioning and recommissioning processes are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance of gas safety valveVSAvoiddecommissioning and recommissioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controllable valves are pre-installed and positioned in the gas-carrying connections before maintenance is needed. These valves can be closed immediately to isolate the specific gas safety valve, eliminating the need for time-consuming system depressurization and decommissioning procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system ensures continuous safety functionality by having at least two gas safety valves, where one can be maintained while the other remains operational. This continuity eliminates downtime and allows maintenance to be performed without interrupting the overall safety function of the hydraulic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If multiple gas safety valves are connected to the valve block, then maintenance can be performed without system depressurization, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem availability during maintenanceVSAvoidnumber of valves and connections
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each gas safety valve assembly (gas safety valve + controllable valve combination) serves as a universal module that can independently perform the safety function. This modular approach allows the system to handle multiple valves with a standardized configuration, making the increased complexity manageable through functional equivalence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of substance

If the gas-carrying connection is blocked by a controllable valve, then gas losses are prevented, but the system requires additional control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas loss preventionVSAvoidcontrol valve mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controllable valve acts as an intermediary element inserted into the gas-carrying connection between the pressure accumulator and the gas safety valve. This intermediary component enables precise control over gas flow, allowing isolation of specific valves for maintenance while preventing gas loss and maintaining system pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3665415B1Safety system for a pressure vessel
Publication Date: 2022.12.28 HYDAC TECH GMBH
  • EP3665415B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3665415B1 patent drawingFigure 1c~2
  • EP3665415B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

The invention relates to a safety system with a valve block (10) to which at least one gas safety valve (12, 14) is detachably connected, comprising at least one controllable valve (50, 52, 58) in or on the valve block (10) and at least one pressure accumulator (42) that receives a gaseous pressure medium and is also detachably connected to the valve block (10). The invention is characterised in that a gas-conducting connection extending at least in sections in the valve block (10), between the respectively connected pressure accumulator (42) and the respectively connected gas safety valve (12, 14), can be locked or released by means of the valve (50, 52, 58).