Additive-Manufactured Valve Body Without Internal Support Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional fuel pump manufacturing methods and designs make it difficult to additively manufacture fuel pumps that are both economical and effective, as they require non-build plate support structures within internal apertures, which are costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

The method involves additively manufacturing a fluid pump case in a tilted orientation without non-build plate support structures, except for coincidental locations intended for post-processing milling, allowing for the elimination of support structures and enabling efficient production of fuel pumps with complex geometries like valve bodies and volute channels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional molding and machining methods are used to manufacture fuel pumps, then manufacturing precision and reliability are maintained, but manufacturing cost increases and production efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoiddimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing method from traditional molding and machining to additive manufacturing, fundamentally altering the production parameters. This enables complex geometries to be manufactured directly without multiple processing steps, reducing both cost and lead time while maintaining acceptable precision through optimized build parameters and post-processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from subtractive and formative manufacturing to additive manufacturing, adding a new dimensional approach to production. This enables the creation of complex internal geometries and optimized structures that cannot be achieved through traditional molding and machining, directly addressing the cost and efficiency concerns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If non-build plate support structures are used in internal apertures during additive manufacturing, then structural support is provided, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidsupport structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for non-build plate support structures within internal apertures by carefully designing the build orientation and utilizing coincidental support only where already intended for post-process milling. This removes the complexity and cost associated with designing, manufacturing, and removing temporary support structures from the additive manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding support structures to enable manufacturing, the patent inverts the approach by designing the part and selecting build orientations that eliminate the need for internal support structures entirely. The manufacturing process is adapted to work without supports, rather than using supports to enable the manufacturing of complex geometries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Adaptability or versatility

If additive manufacturing is used to produce complex geometries, then design flexibility and weight are improved, but manufacturing precision and surface finish deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidsurface finish quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing selective post-process milling on specific surfaces and features after additive manufacturing. This preliminary identification and targeted processing of critical surfaces ensures that design flexibility and weight benefits of additive manufacturing are maintained while achieving the required surface finish and dimensional precision on mating surfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces manufacturing costs, maintains or improves performance, and eliminates the need for additional post-processing steps, resulting in fuel pumps that are cost-effective and comparable in weight and performance to traditionally casted parts.

Implementation Method 1

additively manufacturing a fluid pump case in a tilted orientation without any non-build plate support structure in any internal apertures of the fluid pump case

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdditive manufacturing: 3D Printing

Data Source

PatentEP4339463A1Valve body produced by additive manufacturing and method of manufacturing the valve body
Publication Date: 2024.03.20 COLLINS ENGINE NOZZLES INC
  • EP4339463A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4339463A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4339463A1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

In accordance with at least one aspect of this disclosure, embodiments of fluid pumps, pump cases, valve bodies, and volutes are disclosed herein. Embodiments of methods for manufacturing fluid pumps, pump cases, valve bodies, and volutes are also disclosed herein. Embodiments can include additive manufacturing, for example. Certain embodiments can include additively manufacturing a pump case in a tilted orientation, utilizing only coincidental support structure having a unique shape, and with teardrop shaped volute and/or valve body.