Valve Closure Element Torus Diaphragm Pressure Assistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing valve devices require high drive energy to close due to high pressure differences between inflow and outflow sections, leading to inefficient operation and increased installation space requirements.

Innovation Solution

A closure element with a membrane section and intermediate section design that utilizes pressure differences to support the closure element in a closed position, reducing the required driving force and allowing for better flow adjustment, featuring a torus-shaped membrane section, plate spring prestressing, and a compression spring to counteract outflow pressures without altering the closure element's geometry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional valve designs are used with high pressure differences between inlet and outlet sections, then the valve can maintain closed position, but high drive energy is required to close the valve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive energyVSAvoidclosed position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful high pressure difference into a beneficial force by designing the diaphragm section with a specific geometry where the inlet pressure acts on a larger effective area than the outlet pressure. This creates a net closing force that assists the actuator, transforming the previously harmful pressure differential into a useful closing assistance that reduces drive energy requirements while maintaining reliable closed position stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the diaphragm section, specifically designing it with a torus-shaped geometry where the radius in the closing direction varies along the circumference. This parameter optimization ensures that the inlet pressure acts on a larger effective area, creating a favorable force balance that reduces the energy required for closing while maintaining system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Volume of stationary object

If conventional valve designs are used, then the valve can operate with high pressure differentials, but large installation space is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation spaceVSAvoidoperation with high pressure differentials
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the geometric parameters of the closure element, particularly the diaphragm section's torus-shaped geometry and the relative sizes of inlet and outlet openings. These parameter changes enable the valve to handle high pressure differentials in a more compact design, reducing the volume of the valve body and overall installation space while maintaining the capability to operate reliably under high pressure conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If conventional valve designs are used, then the valve can close against high pressure, but imprecise flow adjustment is achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow adjustment precisionVSAvoidclosing force
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic adjustability through the optimized diaphragm geometry and spring system, allowing the valve to adapt to different operating conditions. The torus-shaped diaphragm section with varying radius creates a progressive closing force that enables precise flow adjustment, while the spring constant can be selected to match specific application requirements, providing both precise control and sufficient closing force

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the driving force needed to close the valve, minimizes installation space, and enhances flow adjustment by leveraging pressure differences to support the closure element, ensuring effective operation even with high pressure variations.

Implementation Method 1

pressure in an inlet section assists the closure element in remaining in a closed position... pressure differences to support the closure element in a closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

A disc spring presses against the mounting element and thus against a radially outer mounting area of the diaphragm section in order to provide a preload on the outer mounting area and to compensate for tolerances and thermal expansion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

a compression spring to counteract outflow pressures... compression spring to counteract the second pressure which acts in the closed position of the valve device via the closing section against the delivery direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP3070381B1Closure element for a valve device
Publication Date: 2019.04.03 GEMUE GEBR MUELLER APP GMBH & CO KOMMAND
  • EP3070381B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3070381B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3070381B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A closing element (6) for a valve assembly (2) is proposed. The closing element (6) comprises an intermediate section (32) extending between a closing section (24) and a diaphragm section (16) and is arranged in an inlet section (12). The diaphragm section (16) and the intermediate section (32) are aligned such that a pressure (p1) in the inlet section (12) assists the closing element (6) in remaining in a closed position.