Valve Control Time Detection via Pressure Oscillations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for internal combustion engines fail to precisely detect and correct deviations in valve control times due to fabrication tolerances and wear, leading to inefficiencies in emissions, consumption, power, and smooth running.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the measurement of dynamic pressure oscillations and crankshaft-position feedback signals using discrete Fourier transformation to determine valve control times, allowing for precise identification and correction of deviations by comparing phase angles with reference values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If mechanical aids are used to minimize fabrication tolerances during assembly, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve control time precisionVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical measurement and adjustment systems with an acoustic field-based detection system. Pressure oscillations in the intake manifold are measured and analyzed to determine valve control times, eliminating the need for complex mechanical alignment aids and tolerance compensation mechanisms during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces pressure oscillations as an intermediary medium to indirectly measure valve control times. Instead of directly measuring mechanical positions and timings, the system uses acoustic pressure waves in the intake manifold that are influenced by valve operation, providing a non-contact measurement approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If valve control times are measured and adjusted during assembly, then manufacturing precision improves, but ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve control time accuracyVSAvoidassembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the engine to self-diagnose and self-adjust its valve control times during normal operation. The control unit continuously monitors pressure oscillations and automatically determines the actual valve control times, eliminating the need for manual measurement and adjustment procedures during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameter from direct mechanical position/time to acoustic pressure oscillation characteristics. By analyzing frequency and phase of pressure waves in the intake manifold, the system indirectly determines valve control timing parameters without requiring mechanical measurement equipment or adjustment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If position feedback systems with reference points are used to detect deviations, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol time deviation detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor and marker system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the existing intake manifold pressure sensor serve multiple functions: it is used for both engine management (air mass measurement) and for determining valve control times. This eliminates the need for separate measurement systems, markers, or additional sensors while maintaining measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the measurement function from a separate dedicated system and integrates it into the existing pressure sensor system. By analyzing the acoustic signal already being captured for other engine control purposes, the system derives valve timing information without adding separate measurement hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If existing measurement methods are used to detect control time deviations, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidvalve control time detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary characterization of the engine's acoustic response during a reference measurement phase. The system stores reference pressure oscillation patterns and uses them as a basis for subsequent comparisons, enabling continuous automatic determination of valve control times without requiring repeated manual calibration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables precise identification and correction of valve control times, improving engine efficiency, reducing emissions, and enhancing smooth operation by accurately determining the fresh gas charge during the intake stroke.

Implementation Method 1

the phase angles of selected signal frequencies of the measured pressure oscillations are determined from the measured pressure oscillations and the crankshaft-position feedback signal using discrete Fourier transformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiscrete Fourier transformation:

Data Source

PatentUS10450977B2Valve control processes for an internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US10450977B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to internal combustion engines and its teachings may be embodied in methods for controlling and identifying valve control times of an internal combustion engine. Some embodiments may include a method comprising: measuring dynamic pressure oscillations in the inlet section or outlet section of the respective series-production engine; determining a crankshaft-position feedback signal; determining the phase angles of selected signal frequencies using discrete Fourier transformation; and determining the valve control times of the respective series-production internal combustion engine based on the determined phase angles, the reference phase angles, and reference valve control times with the same signal frequencies of the pressure oscillations of a reference internal combustion engine or of a model function derived therefrom.