Prosthetic Valve Crimping Sock for Rigid Valve Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional crimping devices are limited in their ability to effectively crimp medical devices such as stents and prosthetic valves, especially those made from rigid materials, and lack portability and mechanical advantage, making them unsuitable for larger devices and devices with non-crimped components.

Innovation Solution

The development of crimping devices with out-of-plane motion mechanisms, such as axial motion perpendicular to the crimping plane, and the use of sloped guiderails or conical surfaces to drive crimping jaws, allowing for radial compression and improved access to medical devices, along with funnel-shaped designs and rotating rollers for crimping and transporting medical devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a static conical tube is used to crimp stents, then the crimping process is simple, but it is ineffective for stents formed from rigid or stiffer materials and those with high radial force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrimping process simplicityVSAvoidcrimping effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic crimping jaws that can change diameter, replacing the static conical tube. The jaws are driven by a mechanism that allows them to actively compress the stent radially, providing adaptive force distribution that works effectively with rigid materials and complex stent designs while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the simple mechanical conical tube compression system with a more sophisticated jaw-driven mechanism that uses controlled radial motion. This substitution enables effective crimping of rigid stents by distributing compressive forces through multiple contact points on the stent surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional crimping devices are designed for large diameter stents, then they can accommodate larger devices, but their size and weight increase, reducing portability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice size accommodationVSAvoidcrimping device portability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs out-of-plane motion where the crimping jaws move perpendicular to the plane of crimping. This dimensional approach allows the mechanism to achieve large diameter crimping capability while maintaining a compact footprint, as the motion occurs in a direction that does not increase the device's planar dimensions, thereby preserving portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If conventional crimping devices use in-plane mechanisms, then the design is simple, but they are limited in size, weight, crimping strength, and mechanical advantage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism design simplicityVSAvoidcrimping strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes out-of-plane motion perpendicular to the crimping plane to drive the crimping jaws. This approach provides significant mechanical advantage by leveraging the geometry of the motion path, enabling generation of high crimping forces without requiring complex in-plane mechanisms. The perpendicular motion creates a more efficient force transmission system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These devices provide enhanced portability, mechanical advantage, and the ability to crimp a wider range of medical devices, including larger prosthetic valves, while allowing non-crimped components to remain in their original configuration, improving the precision and efficiency of the crimping process.

Implementation Method 1

The crimping jaws can be driven by a mechanism out of plane with the plane of crimping, such as axial motion that is perpendicular to the plane of crimping. The use of sloped guiderails or conical surfaces to drive crimping jaws provides enhanced mechanical advantage.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS10918478B2Crimping device
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORP
  • US10918478B2 patent drawing
  • US10918478B2 patent drawing
  • US10918478B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A crimping system for a prosthetic heart valve comprises an elongate rigid body and a radially flexible, tubular sock. The body has an inner lumen extending along a central longitudinal axis between an insertion end and an outlet end. The inner lumen has a greater diameter at the insertion end than at the outlet end. The sock is configured to receive a radially compressible prosthetic heart valve in a radially expanded state within the sock and to pull the valve through the inner lumen of the rigid body from the insertion end to the outlet end with the sock being positioned between an outer surface of the valve and an inner surface of the rigid body. The valve is radially compressed by the inner surface of the rigid body as the sock pulls the valve along the longitudinal axis toward the outlet end of the lumen.