Valve Flow Rib Structure for Turbulence and Knit Line Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Valves face inefficiencies in fluid flow due to turbulent flow caused by obstructions, corners, and structural weaknesses like knit lines, particularly at high pressures and temperatures, which affect both flow rating and structural integrity.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating ribs within the fluid flow paths of valves to direct fluid flow more efficiently around obstructions and strengthen the valve structure, potentially relocating knit lines to more robust areas during molding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If material is molded to fill complex valve geometries with gates and corners, then the valve can be manufactured with necessary structural features, but knit lines form at material junctions creating weak points that reduce structural integrity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve manufacturingVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The valve body is divided into multiple separately molded portions that are later joined together. This segmentation allows each portion to be molded independently without knit lines forming in critical areas, while the joining features (such as recesses and protrusions) ensure proper alignment and bonding between portions, maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The problematic knit line formation is eliminated by removing the gate from the final valve structure. Instead of molding the entire valve as a single piece with gates that create knit lines, the valve is constructed from multiple gateless portions that are joined together, extracting the source of the structural weakness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If valve geometry includes bends, corners, and cross-sectional area differences, then the valve can control fluid flow effectively, but turbulence increases causing energy loss and reduced flow rating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control capabilityVSAvoidflow energy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Sharp corners and abrupt geometric transitions are replaced with curved surfaces and gradual transitions. The valve interior features rounded corners and smooth contours that guide fluid flow continuously, eliminating turbulent eddies and reducing energy loss while maintaining the necessary flow control geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-sectional area of flow passages is varied gradually rather than abruptly. Transition zones are designed with progressive area changes that maintain laminar flow conditions, reducing turbulence and energy loss while still achieving the desired flow control characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If thin sections are used in valve design, then material usage is reduced and manufacturing is easier, but structural failure is more likely particularly at knit lines under high pressure and temperature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial efficiencyVSAvoidstructural reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The valve is divided into multiple portions with joining features that create mechanically strong connections between sections. This segmentation allows thin-walled sections to be used where appropriate while ensuring that critical load-bearing areas are reinforced through the joining features, maintaining reliability without excessive material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different material properties are utilized in different valve portions to optimize both strength and material efficiency. Thinner sections use materials or designs optimized for low-stress areas, while thicker, stronger sections are positioned at critical load-bearing locations and joining features, creating a composite structural approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11105434B2Flow rib in valves
Publication Date: 2021.08.31 AUTOMATIC SWITCH CO
  • US11105434B2 patent drawing
  • US11105434B2 patent drawing
  • US11105434B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A valve can include a rib for improving flow, which can include improving a flow rating of the valve and improving the structural integrity of the valve. A valve can include a valve body, one or more inlets for allowing flow into the body, one or more outlets for allowing flow out of the body, one or more flow paths, and one or more ribs for routing fluid in a flow path. A valve can include an orifice fluidically between an inlet and an outlet and one or more ribs disposed upstream and/or downstream of the orifice. A valve can include one or more ribs in an inlet flow path, an outlet flow path or another flow path and a rib can be coupled between two or more portions of a valve.