Valve Over-Travel Spring Mechanism for Reliable Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety shut-off valves face challenges in reliably closing to a prescribed leakage rate due to manufacturing tolerances, leading to mechanical complications and increased closing force requirements, which are undesirable for compact and efficient design.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an over-travel spring between the main valve closure member and the solenoid or plunger, which provides a biasing force during the over-travel stroke without diminishing the sealing force, allowing for reduced actuator size and cost while assisting the opening force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If stem over-travel is used to overcome manufacturing tolerances, then valve closure reliability is improved, but mechanical complications increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve closure reliabilityVSAvoidmechanical complications
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve closure process is segmented into two distinct phases: primary sealing phase where the valve seal contacts the seat to achieve prescribed leakage rate, and over-travel phase where the stem continues moving to engage a hard stop. This segmentation allows the POC switch to be closed at the primary sealing point without requiring the entire stem travel to complete closure, thereby reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The valve seal is designed to make preliminary contact with the valve seat before the stem completes its full travel. This preliminary action achieves the sealing function and closes the POC switch early in the closure sequence, eliminating the need for complex mechanical linkages that would otherwise be required to coordinate switch closure with full stem travel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If seal over-travel with auxiliary seal is used, then leakage reduction is improved, but additional closing force is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage reductionVSAvoidclosing force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring full seal over-travel with an auxiliary seal system, the invention uses partial over-travel of the stem beyond the primary seal contact point. The stem continues to travel a limited distance to engage a hard stop, providing sufficient additional sealing pressure without the complexity and force requirements of a multi-seal system. This partial action achieves the necessary leakage reduction while minimizing additional closing force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If larger actuator is used to overcome larger closing force, then valve closure reliability is improved, but device size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve closure reliabilityVSAvoidactuator size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The POC switch is designed to close preliminarily when the valve seal first contacts the seat, before the stem completes its full travel. This preliminary switch closure provides immediate feedback that the valve has reached the prescribed leakage rate, allowing the actuator to be sized for the primary sealing force rather than the maximum force required for full stem travel. This reduces actuator size and cost while maintaining closure reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the reliability verification function from the mechanical closure process by using a separate POC switch that operates independently of full stem travel. The switch closes based on seal-to-seat contact rather than stem position, allowing the actuator to be sized for sealing requirements alone without needing to overcome the full mechanical over-travel force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables efficient valve operation without additional closing force, maintaining sealing integrity and reducing mechanical complexity, thus enhancing design efficiency and compactness.

Implementation Method 1

an over-travel spring having a first end attached to the main plate and a second end connected to the valve seal structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

provides a biasing force during the over-travel stroke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10024439B2Valve over-travel mechanism
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10024439B2 patent drawing
  • US10024439B2 patent drawing
  • US10024439B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A valve having an over-travel spring that does not necessarily need an excessively additional force to further close the valve once its valve seal comes into contact with a valve seat. The feature may be achieved by inserting an over-travel spring between a plate or stop attached to a valve stem, and a valve seal. The valve seal may come in contact with a valve seat when the valve is closed with movement of the valve stem. The valve stem may continue to travel after contact between the valve seal and the valve seat without additional force, other than that added by compressing the over-travel spring, and with a proof-of-closure sensor indicating valve closure. The valve stem may be moved in either direction for closing and opening the valve with an assist, such as a solenoid or other mechanism.