Fluid Valve Port O-Ring Retention via Segmented Seal Channel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fluid valve ports with standard O-rings face issues of premature wear, cutting, and jamming due to unsupported spans exceeding three O-ring diameters, exacerbated by dynamic forces and temperature fluctuations, requiring expensive custom machining and O-rings.

Innovation Solution

The optimized fluid valve port design features a standard O-ring seated in a simple rectilinear seal channel with an unsupported span limited to less than three O-ring diameters, supported by a web, maximizing fluid flow and minimizing wear while maintaining the O-ring in place without jamming.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If an unsupported span of the O-ring exceeds about three diameters, then the O-ring can be seated in a simple rectilinear seal channel, but the O-ring tends to pop out, experience premature wear, cutting, or jamming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal channel geometryVSAvoidO-ring seal performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The seal channel is divided into multiple segments: a first portion with a first cross-sectional dimension and a second portion with a second cross-sectional dimension. This segmentation allows the O-ring to be retained in a simple rectilinear channel while preventing pop-out and wear by creating different functional zones within the channel structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the seal channel are given different cross-sectional dimensions to serve different functions. The first portion has dimensions optimized for one aspect of O-ring retention, while the second portion has dimensions optimized for another aspect, allowing the overall system to achieve both ease of manufacture and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If undercut walls are used to prevent O-ring pop-out, then the O-ring is trapped in the seal channel, but expensive machining and custom O-rings are required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveO-ring retentionVSAvoidmachining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using complex undercut walls, the seal channel is segmented into two portions with different cross-sectional dimensions. This simpler segmented structure achieves O-ring retention through standard machining operations, eliminating the need for expensive undercut machining and custom O-rings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention enables the use of standard, off-the-shelf O-rings instead of expensive custom O-rings. The segmented seal channel design achieves the same retention function with conventional components and manufacturing methods, significantly reducing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If the O-ring span is limited to less than three diameters, then the O-ring is retained without wear or jamming, but the fluid flow area is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveO-ring durabilityVSAvoidfluid flow capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The seal channel portions are positioned and dimensioned to provide O-ring retention and durability while minimizing interference with the fluid flow path. The different cross-sectional dimensions of the channel portions are optimized to maintain reliability without unnecessarily restricting fluid flow capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The solution addresses the flow-reliability trade-off by utilizing the cross-sectional dimension of the seal channel rather than just the longitudinal dimension. By varying the cross-sectional dimensions of different channel portions, the design achieves reliable O-ring retention while preserving fluid flow area in the critical flow path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively retains a standard O-ring in the seal channel with minimal wear and jamming, allowing for efficient fluid flow while simplifying manufacturing and reducing costs by using off-the-shelf O-rings.

Implementation Method 1

Because the O-ring is compressed between a floor of the seal channel and the sidewall of the opposing valve body, a slidable seal is provided by the O-ring which prevents fluid leakage.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

age related reduction in O-ring elasticity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8794264B2Fluid valve port optimized for robustness with standard O-ring seal
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US8794264B2 patent drawing
  • US8794264B2 patent drawing
  • US8794264B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optimized fluid valve port has the following features: 1) the seal is preferably a standard O-ring seated in a rectilinear seal channel of one of a first or second valve body, 2) the unsupported span of the O-ring during valve port crossing is limited to a length of less than approximately three O-ring diameters, the support being provided by a web disposed between port openings; and 3), within the area of the O-ring, the fluid flow area of the fluid valve port is maximized.