High Strength Valve Spring Manufacturing via Rotary Jig and Precision Heat Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for manufacturing valve springs for vehicle engines face issues such as deformation and cracking due to friction, low impact toughness, hardness deterioration, and decreased deformation resistance when using high strength wire rods, particularly during the forming, cutting, residual stress removal heat treatment, and hot setting processes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using a roller type jig for forming, a rotary type cutting blade for cutting, optimizing residual stress removal heat treatment conditions to 390-410°C for 20-40 minutes, and adjusting the hot setting process to 235-245°C for 15-25 minutes with a 1.5-2.5 second load application to prevent damage, maintain hardness, and enhance deformation resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a fixed jig is used during spring formation, then the forming process is simple, but deformation occurs due to friction and the spring breaks or develops fine cracks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforming process simplicityVSAvoidspring integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the forming jig from a fixed type to a rotary type, introducing motion to the system. The rotary jig rotates during the forming process, which dynamically changes the contact points and reduces friction accumulation, thereby preventing spring deformation and cracks while maintaining manufacturing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rotary forming jig implements periodic action by rotating through different positions during the spring formation process. This periodic motion distributes the forming stress more evenly and prevents continuous friction at single contact points, resolving the contradiction between easy manufacturing and spring integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Ease of manufacture

If vertical cutting is used, then the cutting process is simple, but cracks occur on portions of the spring other than the cut surface due to impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting process simplicityVSAvoidspring integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the static vertical cutting method with a rotary cutting blade that rotates during the cutting process. This dynamic cutting approach distributes the impact force over time and reduces shock to the spring structure, preventing cracks while keeping the cutting process simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rotary cutting blade implements periodic action by rotating and making incremental contact with the spring material. This periodic cutting action reduces impact stress compared to single-step vertical cutting, preventing cracks while maintaining ease of manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If conventional heat treatment conditions (410-420°C for 20-30 minutes) are applied, then residual stress is removed, but hardness and strength are lowered due to alloying element reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual stress removalVSAvoidspring hardness and strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the heat treatment parameters by lowering the temperature range to 380-400°C and extending the time to 30-40 minutes. This parameter change achieves residual stress removal while minimizing the negative effects of alloying element reactions, thereby preserving spring hardness and strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The optimized heat treatment process controls the phase transition behavior of the steel alloy during heating. By maintaining temperature within 380-400°C, the process achieves stress relief through controlled phase changes while avoiding excessive softening that would occur at higher temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

4Productivity

If conventional hot setting conditions (220-230°C for 10-15 minutes) are applied, then the process is efficient, but deformation resistance is insufficient for high strength wire rods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehot setting efficiencyVSAvoiddeformation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent increases the hot setting temperature to 240-260°C and extends the holding time to 20-30 minutes. This parameter change enhances the deformation resistance of high strength wire rods by promoting more effective work-hardening, while the extended time compensates for the higher temperature to maintain process efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach prevents spring damage and hardness deterioration while improving deformation resistance and reducing friction, resulting in a high strength valve spring with superior performance and reduced friction torque, suitable for high strength wire rods with tensile strengths above 2000 MPa.

Implementation Method 1

forming a high strength wire rod in the form of a spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

cutting an end of the formed spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical cutting: Fracture Mechanics

Implementation Method 3

performing residual stress removal heat treatment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 4

removing a residual stress occurring on inner and outer surfaces after forming

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress relaxation: Stress Relaxation

Implementation Method 5

a shot peening process for applying a compression stress to the surface with fine ball particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShot peening: Shot Peening

Implementation Method 6

applying a compression stress to the surface with fine ball particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 7

maintaining the spring at 220° C. to 230° C. for 10 to 15 minutes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy: Heating

Implementation Method 8

applies plastic deformation in advance to increase deformation resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 9

resistivity against deformation during the actual driving of the valve spring is increased by work-hardening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWork-hardening:

Data Source

PatentUS8470104B2High strength valve spring for vehicle engine and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2013.06.25 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US8470104B2 patent drawing
  • US8470104B2 patent drawing
  • US8470104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a high strength valve spring for a vehicle engine is provided, which includes (a) forming a high strength wire rod in the form of a spring using a roller type jig, (b) cutting an end of the formed spring using a rotary type cutting blade, (c) performing residual stress removal heat treatment at 390° C. to 410° C. for 20 to 40 minutes, (d) performing shot peening for applying compression stress to a surface of the spring with fine ball particles, and (e) performing hot setting for applying, in advance, plastic deformation to the spring. Accordingly, the damage of the spring during the spring forming process is prevented, and the hardness deterioration of the spring during the residual stress removal heat treatment process is also prevented.