Vane Assembly Spanwise Throat Angle for Duct Flow Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mechanical systems with airflow ducts, such as jet engines, face flow quality issues due to low aspect ratio stationary vanes and long exit duct portions, leading to problems at the inner and outer diameters of the duct.

Innovation Solution

A vane assembly with a spanwise throat angle distribution is designed, where the throat angle varies along the span, being minimized near the root and tip, and maximized at the mid-span, to improve airflow distribution by optimizing the throat angle configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If stationary vanes with low aspect ratio are used in ducts with long exit duct portions, then the vane assembly is compact and easier to manufacture, but flow quality problems arise at the inner diameter and outer diameter of the duct

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidflow quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the throat angle along the span of each vane. Specifically, the throat angle is minimized near the root and tip regions while maximized at the mid-span region. This localized variation in geometric parameters optimizes flow distribution at different radial positions, improving flow quality at the inner and outer diameters without requiring a complete redesign of the entire vane structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the throat angle distribution along the vane span. The throat angle parameter is systematically varied to achieve minimum values near the root and tip and maximum value at mid-span. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by improving flow quality while maintaining the compact low aspect ratio geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the throat angle is minimized near the root and tip regions, then flow distribution to end wall regions is improved, but the overall vane complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow distributionVSAvoidvane complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses flow distribution by applying local quality modifications specifically at the root and tip regions where throat angles are minimized. This targeted approach improves end wall region flow without requiring complex modifications across the entire vane structure, thus limiting the increase in overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamics by implementing a continuous variation of the throat angle along the span rather than discrete steps. This smooth transition from minimum at root/tip to maximum at mid-span creates an optimized flow path that improves distribution while maintaining manufacturability through a systematic geometric progression rather than abrupt changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2867510B1Vane assembly for improved flow distribution with high radial offset
Publication Date: 2020.03.04 UNITED TECH CORP
  • EP2867510B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2867510B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~5

AI summary

A vane assembly for use in a gas flow duct. The vane assembly includes multiple vanes arranged circumferentially about the duct. A throat angle of each of the vanes at mid-span is greater than the throat angel at the tips of the vane.