Turbomachine Vane Coating Fatigue Testing Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tests for antifriction coatings on turbomachine rotor blade roots are insufficient in distinguishing high-quality coatings from acceptable ones and fail to accurately assess durability and mechanical performance over the blade's lifetime, particularly in withstanding multiple operational cycles.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising test piece halves with coated bearing surfaces and a counter test piece, subjected to tensile cycles simulating the stresses experienced by blade roots, allowing for fatigue testing that mimics the blade's operational stresses, using resilient return means to maintain contact and measure opening displacements for accurate coating evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standard hardness tests, tensile or shear adhesion tests, and micrographic tests are performed, then coating quality can be assessed, but the tests are insufficient for distinguishing high-quality coatings from acceptable quality coatings and cannot accurately predict durability over the blade's lifetime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating quality differentiationVSAvoiddurability prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary action by subjecting the coating to fatigue tests before final quality assessment. The test piece undergoes cyclic loading simulating operational conditions (10,000-15,000 cycles) prior to examination, allowing early detection of coating defects that would not appear in static tests. This preliminary fatigue exposure reveals potential failure modes and distinguishes high-quality coatings from acceptable ones by exposing subtle differences in coating resilience under repeated stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements dynamics by transitioning from static testing methods to dynamic fatigue testing. The test apparatus applies cyclic tensile loads that simulate the actual operational dynamics of turbine blades during rotation. This dynamic testing regime creates time-dependent stress conditions that reveal coating performance characteristics invisible to static tests, enabling accurate differentiation of coating quality and reliable prediction of service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If real blades are used for testing, then actual operational conditions can be simulated, but the complexity and cost of the testing device increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational condition representationVSAvoidtesting device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies segmentation by dividing the blade into a test piece representing only the critical coated region (blade root or leading/trailing edges) and a separate counter-test piece. This segmented approach isolates the coating under test from the complex blade structure, allowing focused testing of the coating's fatigue resistance without requiring entire blades. The test piece geometry is simplified to essential features only, maintaining operational relevance while dramatically reducing testing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements copying by creating a simplified test piece that replicates the critical geometric and material characteristics of the actual blade coating region. The test piece includes a substrate with coating applied to specific surfaces (bearing surfaces, leading edges, or trailing edges) that are representative of the actual blade's coated areas. This copy captures the essential testing requirements without the complexity of using real blades, enabling reliable coating assessment through fatigue cycling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables a more differentiated assessment of coating quality, correlating with the actual stability of blade root coatings throughout their lifetime, effectively distinguishing between high-quality and acceptable coatings by simulating the blade's operational stresses, without requiring real blades.

Implementation Method 1

resilient return means allowing for the two test piece halves to open up in a direction perpendicular to the tensile direction in response to an opening force applied to these two test piece halves by the counter test piece during a tensile cycle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8408068B2Device for testing the coating of a vane base
Publication Date: 2013.04.02 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US8408068B2 patent drawing
  • US8408068B2 patent drawing
  • US8408068B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for testing a coating for a turbomachine rotor disk blade root, including two test piece halves, each including a bearing surface coated with the coating, one counter test piece including two bearing surfaces, and a machine including a first holding system for the counter test piece and a second holding system for holding the test piece halves around the counter test piece. With a tensile mechanism, the holding systems are subjected to predetermined tensile cycles along the tensile axis, during which the tensile force is transmitted from one holding system to the other via the respective bearing surfaces contacting the counter test piece and the test piece halves. The second holding system includes a resilient return mechanism allowing for the two test piece halves to open up in a direction perpendicular to the tensile direction.