Vanishing Point Correction for ADAS Lane Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ADAS systems, such as FCWS and LDWS, face errors in lane recognition due to variations in the vanishing point caused by vehicle pitch motion or road bends, leading to false warnings or missed collision alerts.

Innovation Solution

A vanishing point correction method that extracts contour points of a forward vehicle, tracks their movement, calculates the variation in width between contour points, and uses this information to correct the vanishing point position, preventing false warnings by accurately determining the vanishing point variation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the vanishing point position is fixed based on initial camera calibration, then the system complexity is low, but measurement precision of lane recognition and object distance deteriorates when vehicle pitch motion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidlane recognition precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic vanishing point correction by continuously tracking the vanishing point position based on detected vehicle pitch angle and road gradient, transforming the static calibration approach into a dynamic adaptation system that maintains measurement precision under varying vehicle conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the vanishing point position parameters in real-time according to detected pitch motion and road gradient variations, allowing the measurement system to adapt to changing conditions without increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the vanishing point variation is not detected, then the system operation is simple, but false warnings are generated in ADAS systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidADAS warning reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces feedback mechanisms where the corrected vanishing point information is continuously fed back to the ADAS system, enabling reliable collision and lane departure warnings while maintaining simple operation through automated correction processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The vanishing point correction module acts as an intermediary between the image processing system and ADAS warning systems, filtering out false alarms caused by pitch motion before warnings are generated, thus improving reliability without complicating user operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If contour points are extracted and tracked to correct the vanishing point, then measurement precision of vanishing point position is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevanishing point position precisionVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image processing into distinct modules: contour point extraction, vanishing point calculation, pitch motion detection, and correction application. This modular segmentation improves measurement precision while managing complexity through organized processing stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10235579B2Vanishing point correction apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 PLK TECH
  • US10235579B2 patent drawing
  • US10235579B2 patent drawing
  • US10235579B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vanishing point correction method may include the steps of: (a) extracting a contour candidate point of an object considered as the forward vehicle from the image taken by the camera; (b) tracking a movement of the contour candidate point over time; (c) determining whether the contour candidate point belongs to the vehicle; (d) setting the contour candidate point to a vehicle contour point of the forward vehicle, when it is determined at the step (c) that the contour candidate point belongs to the vehicle; (e) calculating a variation in width between vehicle contour points at the same height among the vehicle contour points; and (f) calculating a variation of the vanishing point.