Vapor Generator Sonic Throat Ejector for Alloy Coating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current industrial vapor generators for metal coating in vacuum face challenges such as complexity in implementation, maintenance, uneven deposition, difficulty in adjusting to variable strip widths, impurity concentration, and inefficient vapor flow regulation, particularly when dealing with co-deposition of two different metals.

Innovation Solution

A vapor generator design featuring a cylindrical crucible with magnetic stirring, a longitudinal sonic throat ejector, and a filtration medium, along with a proportional valve and radiant heating, allows for even vapor distribution and easy adjustment to strip width, while maintaining a vacuum seal and reducing thermal inertia.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If mechanical shutters with two positions are used to control vapor flow, then vapor flow can be controlled, but the system becomes complex and difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevapor flow controlVSAvoidmechanical shutter system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical shutters with electromagnetic valves to control vapor flow. This substitution eliminates the complexity of mechanical two-position shutters while maintaining precise flow control capability, directly resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a proportional valve that can adjust the opening degree continuously, changing the control parameter from binary (open/closed) to continuous (0-100% opening). This allows precise vapor flow control without complex mechanical mechanisms, resolving the contradiction between operational control and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If induction heating is used to heat the crucible, then heating efficiency is improved, but thermal inertia increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidthermal inertia
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a programmable logic controller to dynamically adjust the induction heating power in real-time based on process requirements. This dynamic control allows rapid adjustment of heating intensity, reducing thermal inertia while maintaining high heating efficiency through optimized energy delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control system where the PLC monitors temperature and vapor flow conditions, then adjusts induction heating power accordingly. This feedback mechanism prevents excessive thermal inertia by modulating heating intensity to match actual process needs, resolving the contradiction between heating efficiency and thermal response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If co-evaporation from two crucibles is used, then alloy coating can be deposited, but the system becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealloy coating capabilityVSAvoiddual crucible system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a single crucible system that can handle multiple metals through sequential or simultaneous evaporation, controlled by electromagnetic valves. This universal design achieves alloy coating capability without requiring separate crucibles for each metal, resolving the contradiction between versatility and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces electromagnetic valves as intermediary control elements that regulate vapor flow from the crucible. These valves enable precise control of multi-metal evaporation processes without requiring complex mechanical shutter systems, achieving alloy deposition capability while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If all or nothing valves are used, then vapor flow can be controlled, but adjustment precision is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevapor flow controlVSAvoidflow rate precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces binary-position valves with proportional electromagnetic valves that can adjust their opening degree continuously. This parameter change from discrete to continuous control enables precise vapor flow rate adjustment, resolving the contradiction between operational ease and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes mechanical two-position shutters with electronically controlled electromagnetic valves. This substitution enables precise digital control of vapor flow rates through programmable logic controllers, achieving high flow rate precision while maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures even and efficient metal deposition with simplified maintenance, high vapor flow rates, and precise control over vapor flow and temperature, enabling effective co-deposition of multiple metals with reduced impurity segregation and thermal management.

Implementation Method 1

a cylindrical crucible with magnetic stirring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic stirring: Electromagnetic Stirring

Implementation Method 2

along with a proportional valve and radiant heating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiant heating: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 3

a longitudinal sonic throat ejector, and a filtration medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 4

a longitudinal sonic throat ejector... shaped so as to create a jet of metal vapour at the speed of sound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSonic flow: Speed of Sound

Implementation Method 5

equipped with a means for ensuring a low-pressure state relative to the external environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 6

precise control over vapor flow and temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure regulation: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11434560B2Industrial vapour generator for the deposition of an alloy coating onto a metal strip
Publication Date: 2022.09.06 ARCELOR FRANCE SA
  • US11434560B2 patent drawing
  • US11434560B2 patent drawing
  • US11434560B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a vapour generator for the deposition of a metal coating onto a substrate (7), preferably a steel strip, that comprises a vacuum chamber (6) in the form of a housing including a vapour deposition head or ejector (3) in tight communication via a supply duct (4) with at least one crucible (1) containing the coating metal in a liquid form and located outside the vacuum chamber (6), characterised in that the ejector (3) includes a longitudinal slot for the vapour outlet acting as a sonic throat and extending on the entire width of the substrate (7), a filtration medium or a charge loss member (3A) made of a sintered material being provided in the ejector immediately before said slot on the vapour path in order to equalise the flow speed of the vapour exiting the ejector (3) through the sonic throat.