Vapor injection heat pump

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current heat pump systems for vehicles face inefficiencies in heat exchange and refrigerant management, particularly in distributing refrigerant flow effectively across multiple heat exchangers and modes of operation, which affects performance and energy efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The proposed heat pump system incorporates a refrigerant loop with a compressor, multiple heat exchangers, branching points, shutoff valves, and a vapor generator, allowing for split paths and modes of operation that optimize refrigerant flow and heat exchange by injecting a gaseous component into the compressor's mid-pressure inlet, enhancing condensing capacity and reducing compressor load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If refrigerant flow is distributed across multiple heat exchangers, then heat exchange capacity is improved, but refrigerant management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange capacityVSAvoidrefrigerant management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The refrigerant loop is divided into multiple paths with separate heat exchangers (first heat exchanger, second heat exchanger, vapor generator) that can operate independently or in combination. Each heat exchanger handles specific thermal loads (cabin heating/cooling, battery thermal management), allowing distributed heat exchange while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic flow control using shutoff valves (first shutoff valve, second shutoff valve, third shutoff valve, fourth shutoff valve) that can adjust refrigerant distribution in real-time based on operating conditions. This dynamic routing enables the system to adapt to different modes of operation (heating, cooling, dehumidification) and optimize heat exchange capacity while simplifying refrigerant management for each specific mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If vapor injection is implemented, then condensing capacity and compressor efficiency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensing capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A vapor generator is introduced as an intermediary component that produces gaseous refrigerant for injection into the compressor's mid-pressure inlet. This intermediary device enables vapor injection functionality without requiring major modifications to the compressor itself, thereby improving condensing capacity and compressor efficiency while limiting the increase in overall system complexity through a dedicated, modular component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple modes of operation are supported, then versatility is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating modesVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The refrigerant loop is designed with universal components that can serve multiple functions across different operating modes. The first heat exchanger can function as a condenser or evaporator, the second heat exchanger handles both heating and cooling loads, and the vapor generator provides vapor injection for both compression efficiency improvement and defrosting. This multi-functionality enables versatile operation (heating, cooling, dehumidification, defrosting) without proportionally increasing control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic control of shutoff valves to route refrigerant flow differently based on the desired mode of operation. During heating mode, refrigerant flows through specific paths; during cooling mode, different paths are activated; during dehumidification, yet another configuration is used. This dynamic reconfiguration allows the system to support multiple modes of operation while keeping control complexity manageable through a standardized valve control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Use of energy by moving object

If compressor load is reduced, then energy efficiency is improved, but cooling capacity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcooling capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the physical parameters of the refrigerant by injecting gaseous refrigerant vapor into the compressor's mid-pressure inlet. This vapor injection modifies the refrigerant's pressure and temperature characteristics during compression, reducing the work required by the compressor and improving energy efficiency. Simultaneously, the injected vapor increases the overall refrigerant mass flow and enhances heat exchange capacity, thereby maintaining or even improving cooling capacity despite the reduced compressor load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves the heat pump's efficiency, increases its heat exchange capacity, and expands its operating temperature range, leading to better performance across various modes of operation, including cooling and heating for both cabin and battery applications.

Implementation Method 1

vapor generator delivers at least a portion of a gaseous component of a first heat exchange fluid to the mid-pressure inlet of the compressor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor injection:

Implementation Method 2

second heat exchanger positioned downstream of the first heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

compressor includes a low-pressure inlet, a mid-pressure inlet, and an outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS11920834B2Vapor injection heat pump
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11920834B2 patent drawing
  • US11920834B2 patent drawing
  • US11920834B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A heat pump includes a refrigerant loop. The refrigerant loop includes a compressor, a first region of a first heat exchanger, a first branching point, a first shutoff valve, a second shutoff valve, and a second heat exchanger. The compressor includes a low-pressure inlet, a mid-pressure inlet, and an outlet. The first heat exchanger is positioned immediately downstream of the outlet of the compressor. The first branching point is positioned immediately downstream of the first region of the first heat exchanger. The refrigerant loop splits into a first path and a second path at the first branching point. The first shutoff valve is positioned along the first path and immediately downstream of the first branching point. The second shutoff valve is positioned along the second path and immediately downstream of the first branching point. The second heat exchanger is downstream of the first heat exchanger.